Ring Mag welterweight rankings on ESPN lol Pacman is #5

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • baracuda
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 10779
    • 259
    • 569
    • 11,470

    #11
    Originally posted by J.B.moneY.
    manny pacquiao should be ranked as the number 2 lightweight WHERE HE BELONGS! but he doesnt know any better, so ricky will knock him back down
    keep wishin you might just pull it off!it's amazing that pacman is ranked #5 when he has'nt even fought at jww that says a lot about him!

    Comment

    • C.Y.
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 2214
      • 81
      • 337
      • 10,088

      #12
      Originally posted by BennyST
      Hey! Look, it doesn't matter that Oscar wasn't even ranked at WW. Oscar was the superstar ok? That means that if Pac beats him he gets to go wherever he wants to damn well go! He's a humble guy all right?
      so should kenny mcbride whatever his name was should be ranked # 3 among the heavyweights after beating an old faded mike tyson?

      Comment

      • baracuda
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 10779
        • 259
        • 569
        • 11,470

        #13
        Originally posted by silip03
        On the ESPN scroll on the bottom of the screen...
        Ring Magazine Welterweight Rankings
        1. Shane Mosley
        2. Miguel Cotto
        3. Antonio Margarito
        4. Joshua Clottey
        5. Manny Pacqiao

        it should be

        1. Shane Mosley
        2. Miguel Cotto
        3. Antonio Margarito
        4. Joshua Clottey
        5. Juan Manuel Marquez or Hatton?
        it would have been ok but you ****ed up on #5 big time IMO,berto or collazo could easily be that!

        Comment

        • warp1432
          the mailman
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 14406
          • 478
          • 347
          • 24,060

          #14
          Pacquiao should be ranked at Welter for his win over Oscar De La Hoya. He should be removed from the rankings if he beats Hatton though.

          I agree with the decision Quintana should be ranked above Berto.

          Comment

          • Ch@mpBox@PR
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 21432
            • 432
            • 279
            • 22,261

            #15
            Originally posted by warp1432
            Pacquiao should be ranked at Welter for his win over Oscar De La Hoya. He should be removed from the rankings if he beats Hatton though.

            I agree with the decision Quintana should be ranked above Berto.
            How's that if DLH wasnt even a WW to begin with.

            Pacquiao being ranked at WW is ridiculous. End of!!!!!!!!

            Comment

            • AntDawg
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Aug 2008
              • 1771
              • 59
              • 48
              • 8,543

              #16
              Yea the rankings are weird...I think Paul Williams is like #5 at Super Welterweight.

              Comment

              • warp1432
                the mailman
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jul 2007
                • 14406
                • 478
                • 347
                • 24,060

                #17
                Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
                How's that if DLH wasnt even a WW to begin with.

                Pacquiao being ranked at WW is ridiculous. End of!!!!!!!!
                Did DLH weigh in at 145? That's the Welterweight limit.

                Beating DLH, even if he wasn't ranked in the top 10, is an extraordinary accomplishment that deserves to be ranked in the top. What's better beating Oscar De La Hoya or beating Luis Collazo? I'm saying beating Oscar De La Hoya.

                You can say he was drained, which he probably was, but they should still rank him for an amazing performance. He deserves to be ranked high. Surely over Delvin Rodruiguez or Zab Judah.

                Comment

                • -Swizzy-
                  The Wolf
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 8820
                  • 431
                  • 330
                  • 661,075

                  #18
                  Originally posted by jgmustangec12
                  On the ESPN scroll on the bottom of the screen...
                  Ring Magazine Welterweight Rankings
                  1. Shane Mosley
                  2. Miguel Cotto
                  3. Antonio Margarito
                  4. Joshua Clottey
                  5. Manny Pacqiao

                  seriously...???

                  IMO

                  1. Mosley (until Cotto beats him again)
                  2. Cotto
                  3. Clottey
                  4. Berto
                  5. Collazo or maybe quintana

                  your opinion
                  I don't know how long you've been watching boxing but, a fighter's success in another division carries on into whatever division he moves in to. So pacquiao's wins over JMM, Diaz, Morales..... all count in the rankings. Its not JUST his win over DLH that is counted. This is how it is and always has been.

                  Comment

                  • BennyST
                    Shhhh...
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Nov 2007
                    • 9263
                    • 1,036
                    • 500
                    • 21,301

                    #19
                    Originally posted by C.Y.
                    so should kenny mcbride whatever his name was should be ranked # 3 among the heavyweights after beating an old faded mike tyson?
                    It was a joke mate.

                    Comment

                    • Ch@mpBox@PR
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 21432
                      • 432
                      • 279
                      • 22,261

                      #20
                      Originally posted by warp1432
                      Did DLH weigh in at 145? That's the Welterweight limit.

                      Beating DLH, even if he wasn't ranked in the top 10, is an extraordinary accomplishment that deserves to be ranked in the top. What's better beating Oscar De La Hoya or beating Luis Collazo? I'm saying beating Oscar De La Hoya.

                      You can say he was drained, which he probably was, but they should still rank him for an amazing performance. He deserves to be ranked high. Surely over Delvin Rodruiguez or Zab Judah.
                      Lol at you. The Collazo that fought Berto would of KOd Oscar like in 5 rounds. So yes a win over Collazo is better than a win over DLH at this point.

                      DLH was a SWW fighting at WW for the first time in 7 years. Pacquiao had a great night. But rankings wise he doesnt deserve to be ranked in the top 10 WWs let alone #5. Thats justt ridiculous.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP