So the Pacquiao vs Hatton undercard is going to be garbage. Was it ever NOT expected

[Adolf]

Typical garbage undercard.

Overmatched opponents who won't last more then a few rounds.

[King Koopa]

Alvarado JUST fought, so putting him in against a tough opponent wouldn't be smart, this is just a showcase fight for him

Glad to see Kirkland get some shine

Soto too

[Addition]

Undercards don't mean **** to me.

[Pacmanjay]

I assume everyone knows the big names so I'll only talk about the B sides.

Pacquiao vs Hatton <- good enough.

Humberto Soto vs Benoit Gaudet (20-1, 7 KOs) <- who?

Mike Alvarado vs Juaquin Gallardo (18-7-1, 5 KOs) <- pathetic

James Kirkland vs Michael Walker (19-1, 12 KOs) <- good looking record but he lost to 34-12 David Lopez and drew/barely beat Antwun Echols in 2008


It looks like another horrible DLH vs Pacquiao undercard, funny thing about that card is that the horrible undercard was actually being talked about in boxing circles as much as the fight itself!

[Pacmanjay]

Undercards don't mean **** to me.

lol, the name of the chic in your AV is Jamie Koeppe

[flotorres]

that undercard sucks i still remember when chavez use to fight
there was good undercards.

[mrlopez]

Its not a bad undercard, but again its not a good one either. just average. But you gotta expect this with Goldenboy.

Co Sign, Golden Girl undercards typically do suck.

But, its going to be good to see some K.O.s too......

Soto, Alvarado and Kirkland are good to watch

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

Undercards don't mean **** to me.

LOL Not a dig at you specifically.


But I've seen this said a few times by people on here.


Never saw an undercard fight you enjoyed? Can be good compensation if a main event fails to deliver.


You guys...do like boxing...don't you?

[Mugwump]

When and what was the last good undercard?