What do you rate Julio Cesar Chavez' resume?

[Texanballer]

He is said by many to be the best Mexican fighter of all time.

Notable wins
Frankie Randall twice
Meldrick Taylor twice
Greg Haugen
Hector Camacho
Roger Mayweather twice
Jose Luis Ramirez
Edwin Rosario
Rocky Lockridge

What are your opinions on who he beat

[Kelly Robinson]

I love the guy but before JCC there was KID AZTECA, now that some old school **** right there.

[AztecWanker]

Dude's resume is padded as fuck.

[Silencers]

His resume is really good, he beat a lot of top contenders and titlists in his day.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

His resume is good but not great.

He fought too many cab drivers, nontheless,, he fought good comp as well. But his resume is overrated!!!!!!!!!

[PrettyBoyRoy 88]

I think his overall resume, as in notable wins and losses, is a great resume. Like a lot of old school fighters, his resume was mostly padded. He's an all-time great though and def top *50 of all time.

[Steak]

padded or not, he has the most title defences in the history of the sport, and almost every one of those title defences were against top ten guys.

just because he fought a lot of bums doesnt mean everyone he fought was a bum. he has a ton of wins over future or former champions.

[crold1]

padded or not, he has the most title defences in the history of the sport, and almost every one of those title defences were against top ten guys.

just because he fought a lot of bums doesnt mean everyone he fought was a bum. he has a ton of wins over future or former champions.

It's a GREAT resume.

[El Dominicano]

He has a really good resume but can be overated on here

[Contenders]

He fought whoever was available to him during his era, had a record number of title defenses, titles in three weights, and so on and so forth. He fought a lot of bums like the old-school fighters did, but did it to keep busy, accept challenges and make money. Plus, his notable losses came towards the end of his career. In other words, he had a great resume.