I am not a nuthugger or fanboy of any of the fighters I mention below. This is just some stuff I have been noticing.
First of all Sam Peter was #7 last week, and now is #6 this week in the heavyweight rankings. And yes they do have the loss to Chambers on his record.
Also, I recieved the ring magazine issue with the top 100 P4P rankings. P. Williams was ranked #12 ahead of Hatton who was ranked at #13. Since that time, P.Williams has beat who they had ranked at #41 Verno Phillips while Hatton has beat who they had at #62 Malignaggi. Yet Hatton is the fighter currently ranked #8 P4P while P.Williams doesn't even crack the top 10. Keep in mind Hatton is with Golden Boy Promotions witch is promoting Hatton-Pacquiao. Also keep in mind Golden Boy owns The Ring Magazine. Are they trying to make the fight more intresting by having it be between two "top 10 P4P fighters"? This is just something that has been bothering me, since the ring is supposed to be the legit ranking system most people turn to.
First of all Sam Peter was #7 last week, and now is #6 this week in the heavyweight rankings. And yes they do have the loss to Chambers on his record.
Also, I recieved the ring magazine issue with the top 100 P4P rankings. P. Williams was ranked #12 ahead of Hatton who was ranked at #13. Since that time, P.Williams has beat who they had ranked at #41 Verno Phillips while Hatton has beat who they had at #62 Malignaggi. Yet Hatton is the fighter currently ranked #8 P4P while P.Williams doesn't even crack the top 10. Keep in mind Hatton is with Golden Boy Promotions witch is promoting Hatton-Pacquiao. Also keep in mind Golden Boy owns The Ring Magazine. Are they trying to make the fight more intresting by having it be between two "top 10 P4P fighters"? This is just something that has been bothering me, since the ring is supposed to be the legit ranking system most people turn to.
Comment