Is Pacman more ripped and faster the Bruce Lee?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Benny Leonard
    Liberty
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2007
    • 7436
    • 303
    • 38
    • 14,471

    #31
    Originally posted by Johnny Rebel
    I don't. I've never seen it work in MMA and the few that tried that BS in UFC during the early days got owned. Yet MANY people really believe that Bruce Lee (an actor) could actually dominate every MMA fighter in any weight class...
    If all that stuff you see in the movies (Lee, JCVD and Segal) actually worked in a REAL fight, you would see those styles of fighting dominating MMA.
    Agreed: that is bothersome and laughable

    Joe Lewis however was a legit fighter.
    Last edited by Benny Leonard; 03-28-2009, 05:55 PM.

    Comment

    • *2TOUGH*
      Engineered Nutrition
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2007
      • 5238
      • 1,515
      • 1,059
      • 12,567

      #32
      Originally posted by Makavelli
      i wanna see Bruce Lee last 24 rounds with MArquez
      it would be a mis-match.. Bruce would KO him and put him on his ass quick. a guy with no boxing gloves would give a beat down..

      Comment

      • solo20
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2008
        • 3821
        • 190
        • 303
        • 22,297

        #33
        Originally posted by Pullcounter
        i have to go w/ pac, seeing as lee is just an actor and pac is the real thing
        Bruce Lee not a real fighter he was in boxing for some time Pac is not as fast as Bruce Lee

        Comment

        • VERDUGO
          We are Warriors!
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2005
          • 4746
          • 249
          • 415
          • 13,930

          #34
          Originally posted by Johnny Rebel
          I don't. I've never seen it work in MMA and the few that tried that BS in UFC during the early days got owned. Yet MANY people really believe that Bruce Lee (an actor) could actually dominate every MMA fighter in any weight class...

          If all that stuff you see in the movies (Lee, JCVD and Segal) actually worked in a REAL fight, you would see those styles of fighting dominating MMA.

          exactly.
          Jui Jitsu,KickBoxing(Muy Thai),Boxing, Wrestling,......Hair Pulling are the real deal.
          All that other Kung Fu bull**** are just for show IMO.

          Comment

          • goblin
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2008
            • 2344
            • 184
            • 38
            • 2,928

            #35
            Originally posted by Pullcounter
            i have to go w/ pac, seeing as lee is just an actor and pac is the real thing

            I'll go with Bruce Lee seeing he created a martial art and manny is a fake ass who fights past prime opposition..

            Comment

            • Memeori
              Contender
              • Jan 2009
              • 227
              • 8
              • 2
              • 6,338

              #36
              Originally posted by vErDuGo
              It don't matter, as long as it's not ACTING.
              Well I guess If it were a Boxing Match then Pacman would win, If it was whatever Bruce Lee practices in as shown in the sparring video then Bruce would win... there both sports and have rules and boundaries.

              In a street fight boxing would be more effective naturally.

              Comment

              • *2TOUGH*
                Engineered Nutrition
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2007
                • 5238
                • 1,515
                • 1,059
                • 12,567

                #37
                Originally posted by vErDuGo
                exactly.
                Jui Jitsu,KickBoxing(Muy Thai),Boxing, Wrestling are the real deal.
                All that other Kung Fu bull**** are just for show IMO.
                No.. actually...


                Where did martial arts originate from?
                Legend has it that the Zen Buddha brought the combat styles of the Indian Warriors across the Himalyan mountians into China. He then started the forms teaching them to the Buddhist monks at the Shaolin Temples.
                At least that's the stock answer everyone gives...
                More realistically, martial arts have been around in various form for as long as people have fought. Wrestling quite probably predates any kind of striking or kicking techniques and dates verifiably to the beginnings of recorded history. The world's earliest civilizations all had their own methods of combat (martial arts) - the Sumerians, Mongols, Greeks, etc. The most successful early cultures kept standing armies, and many of these had rigorously codified methods of traiing in fighting technique.
                Buddhists did not invent the concept of punches and kicks either. As mentioned above, wrestling was probably the first form of combat (and it may have even predated agriculture as a cultural artifact). As fighters grew more sophisticated, they began to fight from greater and greater distances. First with punches, then kicks. Eventually, rocks and clubs were used as weapons, then knives and swords. The developments of spears and arrows was a major breakthrough - in the modern world we have guns and missiles.
                Each culture creates its own answers to the questions of solving conflicts. In Japan, that answer included the samurai and various form of ju jutsu (which later evolved into judo and brazilian jiu jutsu). In Okinawa, fighting techniques were imported This in turn evolved into what we now know as karate. During Japan's occupation of Korea, many Korean soldiers learned karate, and this was mixed with indigenous fighting styles to form tae kwon do. Even the early Shaolin Buddhist monks may have adapted much of their fighting system from the movements of Yoga.
                If we go far enough down the line, all arts have their roots in the cultures from which they spring. But cultures aren't born in a vacuum, so no martial art can claim to be a pure national creation. Combat is as old as the world; Martial arts originate from Man's need to control other men.

                Comment

                • *2TOUGH*
                  Engineered Nutrition
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2007
                  • 5238
                  • 1,515
                  • 1,059
                  • 12,567

                  #38
                  Indian Martial Arts:

                  Comment

                  • Fiday
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 29
                    • 5
                    • 0
                    • 80

                    #39
                    Originally posted by goblin
                    I'll go with Bruce Lee seeing he created a martial art and manny is a fake ass who fights past prime opposition..
                    hmm how many people did bruce lee fight who were in their prime?

                    Comment

                    • solo20
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jul 2008
                      • 3821
                      • 190
                      • 303
                      • 22,297

                      #40
                      Iam a Marine all this **** about martial arts does not work in a real fight thats bull**** it works i have used it aginst other punks in the streets and aginst other fellow Marines hell we use a lot of skills that Bruce Lee created you would be surprise , there is no way that Pac could beat Bruce Lee not in boxing Bruce Lee knows how to box and in a streetfight Bruce Lee will make Pac his bicth
                      Last edited by solo20; 03-28-2009, 06:12 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP