Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Lewis Era vs. The Klitschko Era

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Lewis Era vs. The Klitschko Era

    Ask any boxing fan about Lennox Lewis' ATG status and you'll generally get the same answer : Most people have him on their top 10 Heavyweight list of the greatest to ever do it.

    Ask that same boxing fan about the Klitschko brothers' reign and the result will be.....Well, not exactly the same.

    Throughout his career Lewis was generally looked upon with disdain by most in the boxing public : He fought once a year, he dominated his division, but yet people still defined that era as "post Tyson". Not to mention embarassing knockout losses to 2 contenders of his era : Hasim Rahman and Oliver McCall. Lewis would go on to avenge both of those losses by knockout. But the damage to his reputation was already done.

    In the years since Lennox has retired, a begrudging amount of respect has been bestowed upon the former Heavyweight kingpin : Most people now recognize his talents, and give full credit to his accomplishments.

    Now look at the Klitschko brothers Era : They took the reigns after Lewis' retirement and have pretty much dominated it ever since. Vitali was looked upon as the stronger of the two for a while, but a 4 year retirement and numerous failed comebacks (thanks to repeated injury) thrust his brother Wladimir into the spotlight.

    Wlad is a fighter very similar to Lewis : He's technical in his approach, not one for taking unnecessary risks in the ring, and he's pretty much dominated every opponet put infront of him. To top it off, he also has 2 embarassing knockout losses to contenders of his era Lamon Brewster and Corrie Sanders on his record. Unlike Lewis, Wladimir avenged only one of those losses, scoring a 6 round RTD over Lamon Brewster.

    When casual boxing fans think of the Heavyweight division now, they generally say it's "gone south". Or that it's not nearly as good as eras past.

    But was Lennox Lewis' era really that spectactular by comparison? What's the difference between Corrie Sanders and Oliver McCall? Is there one?

    When it comes to the issue of legacy, most people consider Lewis to be the greatest of his era, and they list him as an "All Time Great" Heavyweight Champion. Fans and experts alike

    When it comes time for Wladimir and Vitali to step aside, they can rest assured that they will go down as the greatest Heavyweights of their era.

    But when it comes to "All Time Great" status, one must ask oneself: Would Lennox Lewis get the same amount of respect he gets today, if during his era, there were TWO Lennox Lewis' who fought in a similar style, dominated their opposition, but refused to face one another?

  • #2
    The Haye Era.

    Comment


    • #3
      Lewis never avenged the McCall KO loss. McCall had a mental breakdown and cried in the ring....most bizarre thing I have ever seen.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Klitschko2009 View Post
        Lewis never avenged the McCall KO loss. McCall had a mental breakdown and cried in the ring....most bizarre thing I have ever seen.
        Answer the question : Would Lewis still be looked upon as the ATG that he is today if there were two of him, dominating at the same time, and refusing to fight one another?

        Comment


        • #5
          In fairness to Lewis,there were names like Tyson,Evander,Moorer,Foreman and many other household names fighting when he was,but right now the names arent there,although I do think Vitaly would have been competitive in any era,it is not fair to compare their eras!!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by The_Bringer View Post
            Ask any boxing fan about Lennox Lewis' ATG status and you'll generally get the same answer : Most people have him on their top 10 Heavyweight list of the greatest to ever do it.

            Ask that same boxing fan about the Klitschko brothers' reign and the result will be.....Well, not exactly the same.

            Throughout his career Lewis was generally looked upon with disdain by most in the boxing public : He fought once a year, he dominated his division, but yet people still defined that era as "post Tyson". Not to mention embarassing knockout losses to 2 contenders of his era : Hasim Rahman and Oliver McCall. Lewis would go on to avenge both of those losses by knockout. But the damage to his reputation was already done.

            In the years since Lennox has retired, a begrudging amount of respect has been bestowed upon the former Heavyweight kingpin : Most people now recognize his talents, and give full credit to his accomplishments.

            Now look at the Klitschko brothers Era : They took the reigns after Lewis' retirement and have pretty much dominated it ever since. Vitali was looked upon as the stronger of the two for a while, but a 4 year retirement and numerous failed comebacks (thanks to repeated injury) thrust his brother Wladimir into the spotlight.

            Wlad is a fighter very similar to Lewis : He's technical in his approach, not one for taking unnecessary risks in the ring, and he's pretty much dominated every opponet put infront of him. To top it off, he also has 2 embarassing knockout losses to contenders of his era Lamon Brewster and Corrie Sanders on his record. Unlike Lewis, Wladimir avenged only one of those losses, scoring a 6 round RTD over Lamon Brewster.

            When casual boxing fans think of the Heavyweight division now, they generally say it's "gone south". Or that it's not nearly as good as eras past.

            But was Lennox Lewis' era really that spectactular by comparison? What's the difference between Corrie Sanders and Oliver McCall? Is there one?

            When it comes to the issue of legacy, most people consider Lewis to be the greatest of his era, and they list him as an "All Time Great" Heavyweight Champion. Fans and experts alike

            When it comes time for Wladimir and Vitali to step aside, they can rest assured that they will go down as the greatest Heavyweights of their era.

            But when it comes to "All Time Great" status, one must ask oneself: Would Lennox Lewis get the same amount of respect he gets today, if during his era, there were TWO Lennox Lewis' who fought in a similar style, dominated their opposition, but refused to face one another?
            Two Lennox Lewis'? I get what you're trying to say but that doesn't make any ****in sense

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by cruzan mario View Post
              In fairness to Lewis,there were names like Tyson,Evander,Moorer,Foreman and many other household names fighting when he was,but right now the names arent there,although I do think Vitaly would have been competitive in any era,it is not fair to compare their eras!!
              Why is it not fair to compare their eras? If you follow this sport, comparing eras is one of the more discussed debates.

              I'm also of the opinion that Vitali would've been competitive in any era. Wlad on the other hand.....not so much.

              The damn near 4 year layoff has really hampered Vitali's status, and has him relegated to "near great" status as I see it. Had he been active the entire time, the result could've been different.

              Also, Tyson was nothing but a big name, and a spent foce during the 90's. He pretty much fell off after Douglas, he had some decent wins, but nothing to rave over. And Holyfield pretty much crushed any chances Mike had of re-establishing himself in the division.

              Foreman was a name, and had some damn good fights during that period, but he was older than dirt.

              And I wouldn't rank Moorer as a household name either. He was a much bigger force at Light Heavyweight than he was at Heavyweight.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Billolden View Post
                Two Lennox Lewis'? I get what you're trying to say but that doesn't make any ****in sense
                How does it not make sense? There are TWO Klitschkos running Heavyweight at the same time.

                Generally speaking, people like to have one Heavyweight Champion.

                Comment


                • #9
                  There's only TWOOOOOO Lennox Lewis'!!!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    what reason would Lennox have not to fight this theoretical clone of himself? the klitschkos won't fight because they are brothers, and while that's unfortunate I think it's understandable.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP