what part of "there is no proof" do you not understand?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DA1CATAS
    Birth of a Monster
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2006
    • 4393
    • 207
    • 17
    • 11,092

    #21
    Originally posted by KILLA RIGHT
    Wow ur the first guy to bring this up....Oj was not found guilty for murder,does that mean he didn't do it?.......
    Originally posted by Fulcrum29
    lol owned .


    Hmmm.. According to the law we all abide by. YES. too you guys lol
    Last edited by DA1CATAS; 03-21-2009, 10:11 PM.

    Comment

    • BoriKua305
      Banned
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 661
      • 14
      • 0
      • 755

      #22
      Originally posted by Milkyway12
      Pullcounter owning these clowns.

      Face it Quitto fans...Quitto will never be on Floyds level.
      milky way is tasting floyds mily cause he talks about him even with something that doesnt got to do with floyd shut the **** up already bout floyd please and spit that cum out ur mouth

      Comment

      • jeg77
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Nov 2008
        • 452
        • 9
        • 6
        • 6,589

        #23
        Originally posted by Pullcounter
        margo definitely is a cheater, but we only have evidence that he cheated against mosley, not against cotto.
        No we only have proof he tried to cheat against Mosely , leaving the doubt did he cheat against other opponents.

        Comment

        • Pullcounter
          no guts no glory
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2004
          • 42582
          • 549
          • 191
          • 49,739

          #24
          Originally posted by Soda Popinski
          Not quite. I mean think about it. Why would it matter whose blood it is??
          because that would link the pads to the Cotto fight

          The fact that it's there means that he wore the same wraps he was caught with during the Cotto fight. You're right, it probably wasn't Cotto's blood, I have no idea how it would get in there either. But that's beside the point.
          if its not cotto's blood there is no way to link the pads to the cotto fight.


          The hard facts are that there was blood on the wraps he almost wore to fight Mosley, and it's in the same spot as the ones he wore when he fought Cotto.
          nope. the hard fact is that there was blood on the pads prior to the molsey fight, but there is no link to the cotto fight. the blood on the wraps in the photo was on the outside of the wrap. you have to find a way for the blood to get inside the wrap, inside the gauze.

          How an old dried up blood stain magically appears on his wraps in the same spot where blood was seen after the Cotto fight....... yet happens BEFORE the Mosley fight isn't hard to figure out. It's pretty obvious that the wraps were re-used. Cotto blood or leprechaun period blood, those wraps are the same.
          once again, the pads were inside gauze, inside several layers of tape. it is not obvious that the pad found before the mosley fight were reused from the cotto fight.

          the only way to link the blood on the pads to the cotto fight is if the blood is cotto's blood.

          Comment

          • crj-lead
            Amateur
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 22
            • 1
            • 0
            • 6,039

            #25
            Originally posted by Pullcounter
            margo definitely is a cheater, but we only have evidence that he cheated against mosley, not against cotto.
            I agree there is no proof, but tell me: do you really believe that he was honest until the Mosley fight????
            Me, I think he's born a cheater !!!
            It doesn't make any sense that a boxer who was able to become the champion of the strongest division without cheating to take such a risk to ruin a brilliant career.
            It doesn't make any sense that a boxer who was able to demolish Cotto, the undefeated champion, in his prime, to cheat against the old Mosley one of Cotto victims.
            Well, in a court those aren’t evidences but on a boxing forum I think it works.
            So, you still believe he was innocent until Mosley fight ??????????????

            Comment

            • Pullcounter
              no guts no glory
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2004
              • 42582
              • 549
              • 191
              • 49,739

              #26
              Originally posted by jeg77
              No we only have proof he tried to cheat against Mosely , leaving the doubt did he cheat against other opponents.
              true, he only tried to cheat against mosley. thanks for the correction

              Comment

              • Pullcounter
                no guts no glory
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2004
                • 42582
                • 549
                • 191
                • 49,739

                #27
                Originally posted by crj-lead
                I agree there is no proof, but tell me: do you really believe that he was honest until the Mosley fight????
                Me, I think he's born a cheater !!!
                It doesn't make any sense that a boxer who was able to become the champion of the strongest division without cheating to take such a risk to ruin a brilliant career.
                It doesn't make any sense that a boxer who was able to demolish Cotto, the undefeated champion, in his prime, to cheat against the old Mosley one of Cotto victims.
                Well, in a court those aren’t evidences but on a boxing forum I think it works.
                So, you still believe he was innocent until Mosley fight ??????????????
                I suspect that margo cheated before the mosley fight, but there is no proof that he in fact actually did cheat before the mosley fight.

                Comment

                • Soda Popinski
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 659
                  • 40
                  • 36
                  • 6,820

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Pullcounter
                  because that would link the pads to the Cotto fight


                  if its not cotto's blood there is no way to link the pads to the cotto fight.



                  nope. the hard fact is that there was blood on the pads prior to the molsey fight, but there is no link to the cotto fight. the blood on the wraps in the photo was on the outside of the wrap. you have to find a way for the blood to get inside the wrap, inside the gauze.


                  once again, the pads were inside gauze, inside several layers of tape. it is not obvious that the pad found before the mosley fight were reused from the cotto fight.

                  the only way to link the blood on the pads to the cotto fight is if the blood is cotto's blood.
                  You can't say that it was on the outside of the wrap only. Why couldn't it soak in deep enough to leave the stain found on the wraps that were discovered pre-Mosley?? That's the nature of gauze and whatever erroneous liquid it encounters. It's going to soak it up, end of.

                  If I'm on a jury and I see photographs of that blood stain matching up on pre-Mosley wraps and post Cotto wraps, knowing that he fought nobody in between that time, that outweighs Marg's lawyer saying "you can't prove it's Cotto's blood!!". Where else would a dried up blood stain in the same location in both pictures come from??

                  I mean you have to use common sense to bridge the gaps a bit. If you give me a list that says A, B, __, D and E.... I'm more inclined to say that the answer is C instead of L, 3.14, a balloon and a 1979 Ford Pinto because I can't prove it isn't.

                  And green K for you for bringing a respectful debate instead of throwing some kind of all too common tantrum.

                  Comment

                  • crj-lead
                    Amateur
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 22
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    • 6,039

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Pullcounter
                    I suspect that margo cheated before the mosley fight, but there is no proof that he in fact actually did cheat before the mosley fight.
                    Yeah, there is no evidence…. again and again, you said it before and I told you that I agree, I just asked for your opinion.
                    Me I don’t suspect it, I’m sure he cheated before.
                    No honest fighter turn in a cheater at the end of the career (or almost the end), especially after such an accomplishment !!!!
                    BTW, I’m not a Cotto fan or Margarito hater.

                    Comment

                    • Pullcounter
                      no guts no glory
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 42582
                      • 549
                      • 191
                      • 49,739

                      #30
                      Originally posted by crj-lead
                      Yeah, there is no evidence…. again and again, you said it before and I told you that I agree, I just asked for your opinion.
                      Me I don’t suspect it, I’m sure he cheated before.
                      No honest fighter turn in a cheater at the end of the career (or almost the end), especially after such an accomplishment !!!!
                      BTW, I’m not a Cotto fan or Margarito hater.
                      you are certain he cheated before the mosley fight on no evidence. that's about as certain that george bush was about there being WMDs in Iraq.

                      once again... there was/is no smoking gun for either WMDs in iraq, nor for margo cheating before mosley.


                      Originally posted by Soda Popinski
                      You can't say that it was on the outside of the wrap only. Why couldn't it soak in deep enough to leave the stain found on the wraps that were discovered pre-Mosley?? That's the nature of gauze and whatever erroneous liquid it encounters. It's going to soak it up, end of.
                      that's definitely a possible scenario, but if its true then the blood on the pads must be cotto's. that's why cotto and his attorneys need to get those pads tested.

                      If I'm on a jury and I see photographs of that blood stain matching up on pre-Mosley wraps and post Cotto wraps, knowing that he fought nobody in between that time, that outweighs Marg's lawyer saying "you can't prove it's Cotto's blood!!". Where else would a dried up blood stain in the same location in both pictures come from??
                      no it doesn't. blood/DNA tests always beat photos

                      I mean you have to use common sense to bridge the gaps a bit. If you give me a list that says A, B, __, D and E.... I'm more inclined to say that the answer is C instead of L, 3.14, a balloon and a 1979 Ford Pinto because I can't prove it isn't.
                      you are correct, common sense should be able to bridge gaps, but that gap is humongous. the only evidnce that we have of margo cheating is the mosley fight. That means I only give you a list of A, _, _, _, _, _... now what can u conclude?

                      And green K for you for bringing a respectful debate instead of throwing some kind of all too common tantrum.
                      yes everybody should be respectful instead of just reacting on emotion. kudos to you

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP