what part of "there is no proof" do you not understand?
Collapse
-
milky way is tasting floyds mily cause he talks about him even with something that doesnt got to do with floyd shut the **** up already bout floyd please and spit that cum out ur mouthComment
-
Comment
-
The fact that it's there means that he wore the same wraps he was caught with during the Cotto fight. You're right, it probably wasn't Cotto's blood, I have no idea how it would get in there either. But that's beside the point.
The hard facts are that there was blood on the wraps he almost wore to fight Mosley, and it's in the same spot as the ones he wore when he fought Cotto.
How an old dried up blood stain magically appears on his wraps in the same spot where blood was seen after the Cotto fight....... yet happens BEFORE the Mosley fight isn't hard to figure out. It's pretty obvious that the wraps were re-used. Cotto blood or leprechaun period blood, those wraps are the same.
the only way to link the blood on the pads to the cotto fight is if the blood is cotto's blood.Comment
-
Me, I think he's born a cheater !!!
It doesn't make any sense that a boxer who was able to become the champion of the strongest division without cheating to take such a risk to ruin a brilliant career.
It doesn't make any sense that a boxer who was able to demolish Cotto, the undefeated champion, in his prime, to cheat against the old Mosley one of Cotto victims.
Well, in a court those aren’t evidences but on a boxing forum I think it works.
So, you still believe he was innocent until Mosley fight ??????????????Comment
-
Comment
-
I agree there is no proof, but tell me: do you really believe that he was honest until the Mosley fight????
Me, I think he's born a cheater !!!
It doesn't make any sense that a boxer who was able to become the champion of the strongest division without cheating to take such a risk to ruin a brilliant career.
It doesn't make any sense that a boxer who was able to demolish Cotto, the undefeated champion, in his prime, to cheat against the old Mosley one of Cotto victims.
Well, in a court those aren’t evidences but on a boxing forum I think it works.
So, you still believe he was innocent until Mosley fight ??????????????Comment
-
because that would link the pads to the Cotto fight
if its not cotto's blood there is no way to link the pads to the cotto fight.
nope. the hard fact is that there was blood on the pads prior to the molsey fight, but there is no link to the cotto fight. the blood on the wraps in the photo was on the outside of the wrap. you have to find a way for the blood to get inside the wrap, inside the gauze.
once again, the pads were inside gauze, inside several layers of tape. it is not obvious that the pad found before the mosley fight were reused from the cotto fight.
the only way to link the blood on the pads to the cotto fight is if the blood is cotto's blood.
If I'm on a jury and I see photographs of that blood stain matching up on pre-Mosley wraps and post Cotto wraps, knowing that he fought nobody in between that time, that outweighs Marg's lawyer saying "you can't prove it's Cotto's blood!!". Where else would a dried up blood stain in the same location in both pictures come from??
I mean you have to use common sense to bridge the gaps a bit. If you give me a list that says A, B, __, D and E.... I'm more inclined to say that the answer is C instead of L, 3.14, a balloon and a 1979 Ford Pinto because I can't prove it isn't.
And green K for you for bringing a respectful debate instead of throwing some kind of all too common tantrum.Comment
-
Me I don’t suspect it, I’m sure he cheated before.
No honest fighter turn in a cheater at the end of the career (or almost the end), especially after such an accomplishment !!!!
BTW, I’m not a Cotto fan or Margarito hater.Comment
-
Yeah, there is no evidence…. again and again, you said it before and I told you that I agree, I just asked for your opinion.
Me I don’t suspect it, I’m sure he cheated before.
No honest fighter turn in a cheater at the end of the career (or almost the end), especially after such an accomplishment !!!!
BTW, I’m not a Cotto fan or Margarito hater.
once again... there was/is no smoking gun for either WMDs in iraq, nor for margo cheating before mosley.
You can't say that it was on the outside of the wrap only. Why couldn't it soak in deep enough to leave the stain found on the wraps that were discovered pre-Mosley?? That's the nature of gauze and whatever erroneous liquid it encounters. It's going to soak it up, end of.
If I'm on a jury and I see photographs of that blood stain matching up on pre-Mosley wraps and post Cotto wraps, knowing that he fought nobody in between that time, that outweighs Marg's lawyer saying "you can't prove it's Cotto's blood!!". Where else would a dried up blood stain in the same location in both pictures come from??
I mean you have to use common sense to bridge the gaps a bit. If you give me a list that says A, B, __, D and E.... I'm more inclined to say that the answer is C instead of L, 3.14, a balloon and a 1979 Ford Pinto because I can't prove it isn't.
And green K for you for bringing a respectful debate instead of throwing some kind of all too common tantrum.Comment
Comment