He does very well in any era, but would lose to some of the best.
mike tyson?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
WTF!!!! Do you guys even know who the fcuk Tyson is? C'mon!! I was on some Tyson ***** last night. The mutha fcuka threw elbows and bites...Mike Tyson is raw a fcuk. (not cus of that, i'm just sayin) I grew up on Mike. His career was fcuked from jump street. As soon as Cus died, it was curtains for Mike's legacy.
Man, the guy was a freak of nature. Put that in the boxing world and you have millions. That's why he was such a spectacle. Was he great? That's a far stretch, but it could be argued by some.
Heavyweights in the '90's? Slim pickins. Tyson never fought the people he should have fought when he was in his early 20s. Why? Because of the people he had around him. Hence, Don King.
i still say Tyson vs. Frazier would be the best line up.Comment
-
Lewis was also well past his prime.
A prime and focussed Lewis is a formidable proposition. As for the implied assumption that Tyson only need land a big shot - I'll refer you to the youtube video (posted on the board today/yesterday) of Lewis taking enormous shots - some from harder hitters than Tyson (Vitali) - and staying upright.I think he tags Lewis early and has an early night.Comment
-
Cliche or not - it's a fact. If you don't believe so I'll refer you to the two fights against Frank Bruno. The second was a fiasco of the highest order. I've never seen a fighter so terrified.Comment
-
Comment
Comment