Im saving this thread for proof that no one givea a damn about these two bums...lol
Better Resume? Camacho Jr or Guzman?
Collapse
-
wow, your hate has reached an all new level, impressive.
You're seriously obsessed with dissing guzman. Yes man, we got it - you're not a fan. That's cool, move on.
No need to call a fighter a bum, someone who I remind you is more accomplished than most people who lace them up. Do you fight? What's your pro record? Have you become champ in multiple divisions? Undefeated?
If not, then really, STFU.
Like someone else said, ask anyone in the sport, anyone in the business if Guzman is a BUM, they'll laugh at you.
Now, we can all point out the shortcomings of his career, the mistakes he (and others) have made on the way here, as well as make an argument that he COULD have accomplished even more. That's all fine, because like in the other thread, those are the exact same points I made. Too critique a man's career is one thing, we call do it (shoulda, coulda, woulda) but for you to constantly bash Guzman at every thread, every post and to make bold claims as to say he's a "bum" or hasn't accomplished anything simply crosses the line to to pure haterism. It's your hate for another man, simple as that.
Call me a nutthugger if you wish, but I disagree. You simply got owned in that thread multiple times and now you're simply trying to boost your confidence by comparing Guzman to Camacho.
At the end of the day, Guzman is a pro fighter, he's won multiple belts in different weight classes, he's still fighting and should get another title or two before it's all said and done. You, you've done nothing.Last edited by ИATAS; 03-16-2009, 09:24 PM.Comment
-
Everyone knows that nuthuggers go overboard, especially on this site. But making a thread about something that even you know the answer to is just ******.Comment
-
Your biggest problem is you put too much emphasis in your own words, your words arent as important as you think.....I got owned on multiple threads...lol..with that alone, I own you.wow, your hate has reached an all new level, impressive.
You're seriously obsessed with dissing guzman. Yes man, we got it - you're not a fan. That's cool, move on.
No need to call a fighter a bum, someone who I remind you is more accomplished than most people who lace them up. Do you fight? What's your pro record? Have you become champ in multiple divisions? Undefeated?
If not, then really, STFU.
Like someone else said, ask anyone in the sport, anyone in the business if Guzman is a BUM, they'll laugh at you.
Now, we can all point out the shortcomings of his career, the mistakes he (and others) have made on the way here, as well as make an argument that he COULD have accomplished even more. That's all fine, because like in the other thread, those are the exact same points I made. Too critique a man's career is one thing, we call do it (shoulda, coulda, woulda) but for you to constantly bash Guzman at every thread, every post and to make bold claims as to say he's a "bum" or hasn't accomplished anything simply crosses the line to to pure haterism. It's your hate for another man, simple as that.
Call me a nutthugger if you wish, but I disagree. You simply got owned in that thread multiple times and now you're simply trying to boost your confidence by comparing Guzman to Camacho.
At the end of the day, Guzman is a pro fighter, he's won multiple belts in different weight classes, he's still fighting and should get another title or two before it's all said and done. You, you've done nothing.
You pay too much attention to what I do or say and your still wrong.
Your obsessed with another man so get it together.
I call it like I see it and you dont like it....guess what? too bad. You act like Guzman is the first talented fighter to waste it...My God you must be a nervous wreck, with hair loss if you stuck up for all the others like you do for Guzman.
Its so simple in Boxing, respect is earned not speculated.
But making a thread about something that even you know the answer to is just ******.-GIFT OF GABLast edited by dondi330; 03-16-2009, 09:44 PM.Comment
-
You act like Im the first poster to create a thread of something they know and believe in...hmmm?
This thread is not for me or what I know its to point out to others that are blind.
Proof is on this thread. You wouldn't believe.Comment
-
Now Considering that both of these fighters have made opponents look dumb(most journey men), both known for speed, both known for fighting bums, both never really stepping up. Both have questionable hearts. Which fighter has better resume and at this rate is Guzman on his way to Camacho status? Or is this combination so pathetic its not even worth discussing?
Personally I have them EVEN and Guzman I believe will have Camacho Jr Fame or infamy.
Camacho Jr 48 (27 kos) 3 losses Age 30
Biggest win- Phillip Holiday - Rocky Martinez
Worse embarrassment- Jesse James quit.
Worse opponent record-Joshua Smith 17-35-1
Wins over fighters with no wins- 5
Last 5 opponents combined losses-39
Fights in 2009-1
Fights in 2008-4
Fights in 2007-2
Fights in 2006-3
5 at home fights (NY and Puerto Rico)
Joan Guzman 29 (17 kos) 0 losses Age 32
Biggest win- Jorge Barrios - Humberto Soto
Worse embarrassment- Nate Campbell bail out.
Worse opponent record-Pascual Polanco 5-32-0
Wins over fighters with no wins-8
Last 5 opponents combined losses-28
Fights in 2009-0
Fights in 2008-1
Fights in 2007-1
Fights in 2006-3
16 fights at home in Dominican Republic (more 50%)
I actually like Jr..... I thought he was gonna be something....
He had good boxing skills, but it just seemed that when the going got tough he didnt want it more than the other fighter.....
He struck me as someone who fought only because his father was a fighter, and not because he wanted to be a fighter.....Comment
-
Blind about what? Lil Camacho having a better resume than Guzman? *SMH* Once again, you are acting entirely too hard to get attention.Comment
-
Dont waste your time with him, his thread was close to dead, it took him to keep it alive lmaowow, your hate has reached an all new level, impressive.
You're seriously obsessed with dissing guzman. Yes man, we got it - you're not a fan. That's cool, move on.
No need to call a fighter a bum, someone who I remind you is more accomplished than most people who lace them up. Do you fight? What's your pro record? Have you become champ in multiple divisions? Undefeated?
If not, then really, STFU.
Like someone else said, ask anyone in the sport, anyone in the business if Guzman is a BUM, they'll laugh at you.
Now, we can all point out the shortcomings of his career, the mistakes he (and others) have made on the way here, as well as make an argument that he COULD have accomplished even more. That's all fine, because like in the other thread, those are the exact same points I made. Too critique a man's career is one thing, we call do it (shoulda, coulda, woulda) but for you to constantly bash Guzman at every thread, every post and to make bold claims as to say he's a "bum" or hasn't accomplished anything simply crosses the line to to pure haterism. It's your hate for another man, simple as that.
Call me a nutthugger if you wish, but I disagree. You simply got owned in that thread multiple times and now you're simply trying to boost your confidence by comparing Guzman to Camacho.
At the end of the day, Guzman is a pro fighter, he's won multiple belts in different weight classes, he's still fighting and should get another title or two before it's all said and done. You, you've done nothing.Comment
-
What the hell are you talking about? are you confused ?
Does he have a better resume? I didn't say that. I said I thought they were even,But if thats your opinion ...good. You've done your post now move on. I dont understand you point. First you say I make a thread about what I already know, then you go and say what I didn't...huh?
Attention?Comment
-
Comment
Comment