Better Resume Pacman or Cotto?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boxaholic
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 2651
    • 38
    • 19
    • 8,927

    #1

    Better Resume Pacman or Cotto?

    Both guys have fought the best in there division. So Here is the line up

    Pacman

    De La Hoya 147
    David Diaz 135
    JMM 130
    MAB 130
    Solis 130
    Morales 130
    Larios 130
    Morales 130
    Velasquez 130
    Morales 130
    3kBattery 126
    JMM 126
    MAB 126


    Cotto

    Jennings 147
    Margarito 147
    Gomez 147
    Mosley 147
    Judah 147
    Urkal 147
    Quintana 147
    Malignaggi 140
    Torres 140
    Abdulaev 140
    Corley 140
    Bailey 140
    Pinto 140
    54
    Cotto
    22.22%
    12
    Pacman
    77.78%
    42
    Last edited by boxaholic; 03-15-2009, 08:16 PM. Reason: messed up with tabs
  • NakiFan
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 6971
    • 435
    • 268
    • 9,796

    #2
    Mosley> anything on pacs record.

    Comment

    • boxaholic
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 2651
      • 38
      • 19
      • 8,927

      #3
      I took got Cotto barely.

      Comment

      • MANGLER
        Sex Tape Flop Artist
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 30142
        • 1,705
        • 2,355
        • 46,598

        #4
        No one questions either guy's res, other than haters who call Pac's opponents old after they fail to beat him.

        Comment

        • ShoguNinja
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jan 2009
          • 496
          • 16
          • 0
          • 6,604

          #5
          Yup! Agreed!^^^

          Comment

          • kadafee
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Nov 2006
            • 374
            • 10
            • 4
            • 6,482

            #6
            I dont think this is even debatable, Pac by a mile.

            No i'm not filipino and no i am not a Cotto hater, just look at my previous posts.

            Comment

            • Sin City
              la mala vida
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2006
              • 27551
              • 1,757
              • 2,208
              • 47,596

              #7
              Originally posted by mangler
              No one questions either guy's res, other than haters who call Pac's opponents old after they fail to beat him.
              So Barrera and Morales weren't old??

              Comment

              • Sin City
                la mala vida
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2006
                • 27551
                • 1,757
                • 2,208
                • 47,596

                #8
                Pacquiao has the better resume as of now.

                Comment

                • MANGLER
                  Sex Tape Flop Artist
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 30142
                  • 1,705
                  • 2,355
                  • 46,598

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Howlin' Wolf
                  So Barrera and Morales weren't old??

                  Wanna call EM shot in the 3rd fight, that I'm cool wit. Beyond that it don't stick. MAB looked like he coulda won the 2nd fight if he felt like actually fightin, he just didn't. I got no prob wit either Cotto or Pac's res.

                  Comment

                  • boxaholic
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 2651
                    • 38
                    • 19
                    • 8,927

                    #10
                    I don't see any other active fighters with there quality of opponents with that much success.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP