Is the UK PPV showing more fights than U.S PPV? (Khan-Barrera)

**gingeralbino** · 03-14-2009, 11:37 AM

Really **** for ppv, I'm going to the pub to watch it.
Enzo Mac is on, and Cook, they're not bad, good to watch but not PPv worthy, neither is Khan but he's got the sky contract and all that.

**Shanks** · 03-14-2009, 11:38 AM

they will show the maccarinelli fight and maybe another 1 before khan. if the main event finishes early they will show the rest of the card. if there is anything worthwhile to show on the undercard they will anyway

**PAC-BOY** · 03-14-2009, 11:38 AM

PPV sucks ass. who cares who are showing more **** fights. No disrespect to you,,,good question

**hammerhiem** · 03-14-2009, 11:39 AM

theres at least 5 fights on the card, to be honest Khan isn't really the headline fight, Cook Vs Martinez for the WBO is the headline fight, Enzo Maccarinelli is also fighting and the pryce vs Hall fight is a good domestic dust up aswell.

it's a reasonable card, but it's not worthy of PPV.

**Shanks** · 03-14-2009, 11:39 AM

Originally posted by El Alacr�n

Is it just a 2 fight undercard in britain like in the u.s?

what station are they showing it on in the US

**BetterCallSaul** · 03-14-2009, 11:40 AM

Originally posted by gingeralbino

Really **** for ppv, I'm going to the pub to watch it.
Enzo Mac is on, and Cook, they're not bad, good to watch but not PPv worthy, neither is Khan but he's got the sky contract and all that.

This is a good ppv, so to say it's **** is pretty ******.

**HeaneyCFC** · 03-14-2009, 11:42 AM

I think they're showing 4 fights. Pryce, Maccarinelli, Cook and Khan. Although it's not really PPV worthy it's still only �15 so I'd say it's worth the money. Not like the US PPVs which are ususally $50 for the main event and an undercard of mismatches

**hammerhiem** · 03-14-2009, 11:42 AM

Originally posted by timba1988

This is a good ppv, so to say it's **** is pretty ******.

How is a B level world title fight (Cook) 2 interim title fights and a domestic dust up be a good PPV?

Seriously, thats madness.

**gingeralbino** · 03-14-2009, 11:45 AM

I said **** for pay per view.
Should be good fights but Barrera is the only one who deserves to be on PPV, and I'm not even sure this version of Barrera belongs there.
Definatley worth watching, I'll be in the pub, but I personally wouldnt pay for it.

Is the UK PPV showing more fights than U.S PPV? (Khan-Barrera)