Hopkins vs. Winky vs. Pavlik @ Middleweight

[NeXt In Line]

In their primes, who wins these match-ups at 160? Hopkins had his 20 defenses, Winky was always Winky with his awesome defense and masterful jab (not like when he was at 170) and Pavlik is also much better at 160 than over the weight.

Who comes out on top?

[Silencers]

Hopkins would beat them both.

[Abstraction]

Hopkins.

IMO, the Best MW ever are Hopkins, Hagler and Monzon. Not going to put them in order, since it's pointless, but imo, they are top 3.

[ßringer]

Hopkins would beat them both.

I agree with this guy.

[larryx]

Same results..differant weight

[larryx]

Hopkins.

IMO, the Best MW ever are Hopkins, Hagler and Monzon. Not going to put them in order, since it's pointless, but imo, they are top 3.

co-sign./.....................

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Why is Pavlik even in this?

Its like saying Tyson vs Ali vs Tye Fields

Hopkins takes it.

[NeXt In Line]

Why is Pavlik even in this?

Its like saying Tyson vs Ali vs Tye Fields

Hopkins takes it.

Because it's been debated that he could have performed better if it were at Middleweight, same with Winky.

[yesihavearm]

Because it's been debated that he could have performed better if it were at Middleweight, same with Winky.

I'd like to know how being at 160 that night would have helped him ?

[ztrac79]

Hopkins beats Pavlik no doubt, but I'd have to go with Wright at 160. The extra weight hurt Winky IMO. He was slower and looked to tire quicker. I thought the fight even with these factors was a very very close fight regardless what the judges had.