The klits or the marquez bros

[Thread Stealer]

Ha im sorry im done with this thread i thought it was a discussion there r some people here getting butt-hurt(not u) so im out to another thread..peace

If people take a message board too seriously, that's their problem.

It's no reason to stop discussing the subject.

Heavyweights are generally more popular, but is that a reason to rate them above smaller fighters with greater achievements and opposition?

[KnockoutTheFat]

Vitali's best wins are over old, inactive Corrie Sanders, Sam Peter, fat Kirk Johnson, and Herbie Hide.

Vitali didn't beat Lennox Lewis?

[Thread Stealer]

Vitali didn't beat Lennox Lewis?

Only through 2 rounds.

[PrettyBoyRoy 88]

If people take a message board too seriously, that's their problem.

It's no reason to stop discussing the subject.

Heavyweights are generally more popular, but is that a reason to rate them above smaller fighters with greater achievements and opposition?

Yeah most def..well the klits style is boring u know they say u cant please everybody..Marquez's fights r 50xs more exciting than the Klits..but i really cant stand myself saying marquz better than Klits its insane but i am outnumbered..when my dad comes back from overseas i will ask him for his opinion on this and i'll argue with him if he says the marquez haha this internet arguing is crazy people get out f hand with their vocabulary but i think at 55yrs old he will think historically-wise and say the Klits r better but Marquez r more exciting and trust me if i had to pay 50 bucks for a fight? Def the Marquez's i would just ignore the Klits..im just trying to be realistic but i am against the whole boxingscene site here haha its cool though

[KILLA RIGHT]

What are the klits top wins? You can even argue that jmm has never really lost...Rafa didnt lose 4 how long like 7 ****en years? Jesus it's not even close...Wlad and vitali have beaten scrubs and lost to scrubs(wlad) the least they can do is kick there ass in 3 rounds and show they are far superior instead of taking 10000 rounds to beat them

[MaD RoBoT]

PACQUIAO BROTHERS!!! Bobby P. would smoke them fools

[THe TRiNiTY]

Honestly, to me it's not even close.

Marquez brothers, all the way.

When you look at their title fight records, both do well, with the numbers....

Marquez brothers = 17 (12) - 5 - 1
Klitschko brothers = 19 (18) - 4 - 0

Both are pretty even, realistically. From there, it all favors the Marquez brothers.

You can't give me the argument of skill, for the record. All four men are trained well, decent to great condition for most all of their fights and so that argument goes out the window. If you've watched all at their best, you know all are fundamentally sound.

Nonetheless, HONESTLY.. What group of fighters would you rather have.

Chris Byrd (combined 3 times)
Monte Barrett
Francois Botha
Ray Mercer
Jameel McCline
Corrie Sanders (combined 2 times)
Lamont Brewster (2 times)
Samuel Peter (combined 2 times)
Calvin Brock
Sultan Ibragimov
Tony Thompson
Hasim Rahman
Lennox Lewis

Or....

Rocky Juarez
Agapito Sanchez
Freddie Norwood
Robbie Peden
Manuel Medina
Derrick Gainer
Manny Pacquiao (2 times)
Chris John
Marco Antonio Barrera
Joel Casamayor
Juan Diaz
Tim Austin
Israel Vazquez (2 times)
Mark Johnson (2 times)
Silence Mabuza (2 times)

Both Marquez brothers are ranked higher, even their average is higher than either Klitschko in terms of ranking. Both fighters ahave one opponent each that they have fought closely that is ranked, higher for that matter.

Both Marquez brothers have combined more Hall of famers, (or ATLEAST potential HOFamers, ) on their combined resume. Both have fought in or are in tougher divisions, if you go by talent and the rankings.

The fighters they have on their resumes also STILL rank higher than the Klitschko foes do. By The Ring's standards, only two of the Klitschko brothers former challengers are ranked in the top ten in the division. Whereas 7 of the Marquez brothers former opponents are still ranked.

To me, not even a close comparison. And I've been friendly to the Klitschko brothers but.....

MARQUEZ BROS. > KLITSCHKO BROS.

[THe TRiNiTY]

Also, keep in mind... The Klitschko's have the advantage of splitting the work. They're in the same division. With the Marquez brothers, they've accomplished what they have in different divisions, numerous ones.

[GoAltYourFace]

overall marquez brothers are better

even in ****sexuality

[Low Blow Armo]

I know everyone is entitled to their opinion, but if anyone in their right mind thinks that the Klitschkos are better or will have a stronger legacy than the Marquez brothers, are either ****ed up in the head or really ****in ******.