I was reading a youtube comment, and someone used the Berbick fight to explain why Tyson was better than Ali. He said, "Look how Ali did against Berbick, and it took Tyson two rounds to finish him." If you think Tyson would beat Ali, that's fine, but that was such a bull**** argument. He obviously knew nothing.
I can't believe someone tried to compare Ali and Tyson this way.
Collapse
-
It is a pretty good example of why the triangle thing doesn't work out, it over simplfies everything. Tyson probably would beat the Ali that fought Berbick, but I doubt he meant it in such a narrow view. -
lolI was reading a youtube comment, and someone used the Berbick fight to explain why Tyson was better than Ali. He said, "Look how Ali did against Berbick, and it took Tyson two rounds to finish him." If you think Tyson would beat Ali, that's fine, but that was such a bull**** argument. He obviously knew nothing.
Its not even worth trying to reason is itComment
-
The only thing is use Berbick as a comparision for is when someone flops around the ring like a fish out of water. Berbick is aces in that category.Comment
-
Good point, but the Ali that fought Berbick was completely shot, and was suffering symptoms of Parkinson's disease. There'd be many HWs who would've beaten Ali that night.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Yea I doubt that is what the person was talking about, that was definetly not the real Ali (atleast as people know him) so using that fight for comparison from the get go just shows an overall lack of understanding of the fight game.Comment
-
not really sure why you had to make a thread about that. seriously why? obviously it was a ******ed comment, but what do you get out out of posting this ****.
the responses will be in order: it was a ****** comment, LAWL tyson fans fail, fail, g those cool aid drinkers
seriously why do you give a ****Comment
Love those Tyson fanboys.
Comment