Yes, bigger chin, chest, wrist, fist, calves, longer reach, taller. Manny is 5'6 1/2 ricky is a even 5'6. Those pictures u see of them together in the UK is deceptive; ricky was wearing nike shox while Pacquiao was wearing dress shoes. Only advantage ricky has is waist size.
Unless u consider having more FAT/LARD advantage.
ummm.. Hatton is always in shape come fight time.. his waist size looks fat alright..
Yes, bigger chin, chest, wrist, fist, calves, longer reach, taller. Manny is 5'6 1/2 ricky is a even 5'6. Those pictures u see of them together in the UK is deceptive; ricky was wearing nike shox while Pacquiao was wearing dress shoes. Only advantage ricky has is waist size.
Unless u consider having more FAT/LARD advantage.
Well, first off, I'm a Pacquiao fan. I hope you don't assume I'm a Hatton fan because I disagreed with you. Can you post the source where you're getting your stats from? Especially height. Ricky is around 1" taller, according to most sources. And you're wrong about fist size. Hatton has the larger fists.
The chin comparison is frankly ridiculous. Since when has chin size been a measurement in boxing?
Yes, bigger chin, chest, wrist, fist, calves, longer reach, taller. Manny is 5'6 1/2 ricky is a even 5'6. Those pictures u see of them together in the UK is deceptive; ricky was wearing nike shox while Pacquiao was wearing dress shoes. Only advantage ricky has is waist size.
Comment