Why Haven't I Heard Adamek Acknowledge Hopkins?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bhopreign
    Banned
    • Jun 2006
    • 11273
    • 419
    • 100
    • 12,036

    #11
    Originally posted by mt102879
    I look forward to it!
    Hopkins looks like a caged, rabid animal in that avatar, the man strikes fear in his opponents.

    Comment

    • STEELHEAD
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Nov 2004
      • 14730
      • 537
      • 478
      • 27,196

      #12
      Originally posted by Bhopreign
      I see no advantages for Adamek in the fight, if anyone can tell me a strategy for Adamek Id be more than willing to listen.
      adameks younger, bigger, stronger and in his prime. a much smarter and skilled boxer than pavlik.
      hopkins is just talking imo.
      do you think hopkins could ko oneil bell like adamek did?
      remember these guys are cruiserwts
      Last edited by STEELHEAD; 03-08-2009, 03:40 PM. Reason: bell

      Comment

      • Bhopreign
        Banned
        • Jun 2006
        • 11273
        • 419
        • 100
        • 12,036

        #13
        Originally posted by steelhead
        adameks younger, bigger, stronger and in his prime. a much smarter and skilled boxer than pavlik.
        hopkins is just talking imo.
        Hopkins is dead serious, he let the Maskaev fight get away and Im sure he regrets it. Being younger isnt always an advantage, many times it isnt as experience wins many times. Who has landed much leather on Hop, thats always the telling point in his fights, Adamek is a late starter and can be feinted and outworked into him not throwing back in fights I've seen of his, I just hope this fight comes off and I hope Hop is the underdog, I will lay serious cash on this one.

        Comment

        • Bhopreign
          Banned
          • Jun 2006
          • 11273
          • 419
          • 100
          • 12,036

          #14
          Originally posted by steelhead
          adameks younger, bigger, stronger and in his prime. a much smarter and skilled boxer than pavlik.
          hopkins is just talking imo.
          do you think hopkins could ko oneil bell like adamek did?
          remember these guys are cruiserwts
          Ive never been high on Bell, besides you dont need to KO someone to win.

          Comment

          • STEELHEAD
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Nov 2004
            • 14730
            • 537
            • 478
            • 27,196

            #15
            Originally posted by Bhopreign
            Hopkins is dead serious, he let the Maskaev fight get away and Im sure he regrets it. Being younger isnt always an advantage, many times it isnt as experience wins many times. Who has landed much leather on Hop, thats always the telling point in his fights, Adamek is a late starter and can be feinted and outworked into him not throwing back in fights I've seen of his, I just hope this fight comes off and I hope Hop is the underdog, I will lay serious cash on this one.
            remember adamek is 20lbs bigger than pavlik!

            Comment

            • Bhopreign
              Banned
              • Jun 2006
              • 11273
              • 419
              • 100
              • 12,036

              #16
              Originally posted by steelhead
              remember adamek is 20lbs bigger than pavlik!
              But he has to land.

              Comment

              • MANGLER
                Sex Tape Flop Artist
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 30142
                • 1,705
                • 2,355
                • 46,598

                #17
                I don't see why Adamek wouldn't do it. Biggest fight of his career easily.

                Comment

                • Mr. Ryan
                  Guest
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2004
                  • 23429
                  • 1,301
                  • 1,089
                  • 29,664

                  #18
                  Originally posted by mt102879
                  I look forward to it!
                  The article should be in up in the next few hours. I've added some thoughts from Steve Cunningham to the piece for added ****e.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP