Marvin Hagler vs Carlos Monzon

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • andrewcuff
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 1790
    • 83
    • 57
    • 2,078

    #1

    Marvin Hagler vs Carlos Monzon

    How do you guys rate these two legendary middleweight champions, arguably #1/#2 All-Time in terms of

    1) Skills
    2) Resume
    11
    Overall Marvin Hagler is Superior
    54.55%
    6
    Overall Carlos Monzon is Superior
    36.36%
    4
    They're About Even
    9.09%
    1
  • -Boxzilla-
    undisputed
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 7975
    • 1,230
    • 1,610
    • 14,970

    #2
    i have monzon ahead but its real close ...

    Comment

    • Silencers
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 21957
      • 505
      • 235
      • 32,983

      #3
      I think Hagler was the better overall fighter, he could fight on the outside as well as the inside which is what Monzon lacked, he wasn't comfortable fighting on the inside and resorted to clinching his way out of that position a lot.

      Resume wise it's pretty close because their biggest wins were against guys who were arguably better in the lower weight classes, Napoles, Griffith and Benvenuti for Monzon. Hearns and Duran for Hagler. They both beat their fair share of top contenders.

      Overall I think Hagler was better but not by too much.

      Comment

      • andrewcuff
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 1790
        • 83
        • 57
        • 2,078

        #4
        My vote goes to Hagler...

        Comment

        • andrewcuff
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 1790
          • 83
          • 57
          • 2,078

          #5
          How about comparing the resume of each fighter?

          Comment

          • El Dominicano
            Banned
            • Aug 2007
            • 10074
            • 226
            • 49
            • 10,758

            #6
            All I know is, I never been impressed with the very few videos I've seen on Carlos Monzon

            Comment

            • andrewcuff
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 1790
              • 83
              • 57
              • 2,078

              #7
              Damn, I thought this thread would have seen more replies!

              Comment

              • Miburo
                Double X
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2007
                • 9112
                • 515
                • 356
                • 18,175

                #8
                This is basically impossible to definitively decide. Monzon is perhaps the most difficult fighter to objectively evaluate in the history of boxing.

                Comment

                • Miburo
                  Double X
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 9112
                  • 515
                  • 356
                  • 18,175

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Devil Man
                  All I know is, I never been impressed with the very few videos I've seen on Carlos Monzon
                  This is exactly where the problem lies. It's impossible to say what it really was that made Monzon great. He was undeniably a great, but it's the quintessential case of the sum being greater than the parts. One of the most bizarre (perhaps it's more accurate to say bipolar) personalities and physical freaks to ever step into the ring.

                  Comment

                  • andrewcuff
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 1790
                    • 83
                    • 57
                    • 2,078

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Tengoshi
                    This is exactly where the problem lies. It's impossible to say what it really was that made Monzon great. He was undeniably a great, but it's the quintessential case of the sum being greater than the parts. One of the most bizarre (perhaps it's more accurate to say bipolar) personalities and physical freaks to ever step into the ring.
                    Can you explain, my knowlege of Monzon is a bit sketchy. What physical attributes/skills did Monzon have that were greater than Hagler and how do you compare their resumes?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP