which p4p ranking is the most reliable?

**Ch@mpBox@PR** · 03-06-2009, 03:45 AM

Originally posted by DJR005

I always look up dif websites and magazines p4p rankings and it seems that with the acception of the top 4...manny..jmm..hopkins..vazquez...the rest of the order is always inconsistent...so which website or magazine has the best ranking criteria?

Its hard to tell since this a opinions thing.
I bet my list looks way different than yours, and I bet I can justify evryone in it and his position, and I bet you can do the same in yours

1.Pacquiao
2.JMM
3.B-Hop
4.Calderon
5.Vazquez
6.Mosley
7.Cotto
8.Darchinyan
9.Hatton
10.Pavlik or Marquez

Whats yours?

**WetSexyLlamaPR** · 03-06-2009, 03:50 AM

The Ring Magazine P4P rankings. No question in my mind. They are "The Bible of Boxing". I don't agree with them not having Cotto in their top 10 as of right now but for the most part their rankings are spot on IMO.

**klipsch speaker** · 03-06-2009, 03:51 AM

Usually its the one where they pool some boxing writers and experts and lets them vote. Thats really better than the one being made by one man...

**badboypeenoy** · 03-06-2009, 03:52 AM

Probably f-i-g-h-tnewsdotcom's ranking. Ring magazine tends to favor GBP fighters.

**Ch@mpBox@PR** · 03-06-2009, 03:55 AM

Originally posted by WetSexyLlamaPR

The Ring Magazine P4P rankings. No question in my mind. They are "The Bible of Boxing". I don't agree with them not having Cotto in their top 10 as of right now but for the most part their rankings are spot on IMO.

Their rankings are decent, but sometimes they screw it up like any one else.

I mean they have Pacquaio as a top 5 WW, thats ridiculous. They dont have Cotto in theri P4P rankings and have Rafa Marquez at number 5, and Marquez has not won a fight in 2 years.

They are OK, but in no way, shape or form they are the bible, plus the fact that GBP owns it, is another factor!!!!!!!!!!!!

**DJR005** · 03-06-2009, 03:58 AM

Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR

Its hard to tell since this a opinions thing.
I bet my list looks way different than yours, and I bet I can justify evryone in it and his position, and I bet you can do the same in yours

1.Pacquiao
2.JMM
3.B-Hop
4.Calderon
5.Vazquez
6.Mosley
7.Cotto
8.Darchinyan
9.Hatton
10.Pavlik or Marquez

Whats yours?

Mine is actually a little close to yours except a few...this is my order....1)pacman...2)jmm..3) b-hop...4)vasquez...5)calderon...6) cotto...7) mosley...8)williams...9)darchinyan...10)hatton

**Ch@mpBox@PR** · 03-06-2009, 04:01 AM

Originally posted by badboypeenoy

Probably f-i-g-h-tnewsdotcom's ranking. Ring magazine tends to favor GBP fighters.

Do they have p4P rankings?

**Ch@mpBox@PR** · 03-06-2009, 04:02 AM

Originally posted by DJR005

Mine is actually a little close to yours except a few...this is my order....1)pacman...2)jmm..3) b-hop...4)vasquez...5)calderon...6) cotto...7) mosley...8)williams...9)darchinyan...10)hatton

Its a pretty cool list. Ill put Williams in ine at 9 if he beats Winky!!!!!!!!!!!

**MANGLER** · 03-06-2009, 08:58 AM

I look at Ring or ESPN.

which p4p ranking is the most reliable?