Poll: If JMM beats Cotto will he be p4p#1???

[Mr. Fantastic]

Agreed. thats nonsense. Cotto will have to beat Pac and Mosley to be number 1 and thats counting on what JMM does, because he is the runner up to number 1!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ill say if he beats Clottey,Pacquaio and Mosley he is number 1!!!!!!!!!

Cotto isn't even in the rankings anymore(though I think he should). Pac isn't a WW also. If he beats top WWs like he was doing before the Margarito loss then he should be top 5 again. But as for #1, I think its a long road to that, especially with the loss. No offense btw, its just my opinion.

[street bully]

Cotto is waaaaaay too big for JMM. In a P4P fight Marquez would knock Cotto out if they were the same size, but come on in reality Cotto would demolish him within the first 6 rounds if they were to fight, he is just too big and strong for him. Cotto would also knock Pacquiao out in the first 6.

[Mr. Fantastic]

Because Neither will use plaster.

Because Cotto already beat Mosley and Pac beat everyone else.

*Yawn* There you go with your plaster **** again. Don't you have anything new to talk about??

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Cotto isn't even in the rankings anymore(though I think he should). Pac isn't a WW also. If he beats top WWs like he was doing before the Margarito loss then he should be top 5 again. But as for #1, I think its a long road to that, especially with the loss. No offense btw, its just my opinion.

I definetly agree with you.

1 thing tho. Why people say Cotto is not top 10 P4P anymore. Just because the ring Magazine list doesnt have him? because if yoiu ask me that list is Garbage.

This is what the top 10 should look right now
1.Pacquaio
2.JMM
3.B-Hop
4.Calderon
5.Vazquez
6.Mosley
7.Cotto
8.Darchinyan
9.Hatton
10.Marquez/Pavlik!!!!!!!

[Mr. Fantastic]

I definetly agree with you.

1 thing tho. Why people say Cotto is not top 10 P4P anymore. Just because the ring Magazine list doesnt have him? because if yoiu ask me that list is Garbage.

This is what the top 10 should look right now
1.Pacquaio
2.JMM
3.B-Hop
4.Calderon
5.Vazquez
6.Mosley
7.Cotto
8.Darchinyan
9.Hatton
10.Marquez/Pavlik!!!!!!!

I wouldn't go and call it garbage, but at times I don't always agree with their ratings.

[dondi330]

I definetly agree with you.

1 thing tho. Why people say Cotto is not top 10 P4P anymore. Just because the ring Magazine list doesnt have him? because if yoiu ask me that list is Garbage.

This is what the top 10 should look right now
1.Pacquaio
2.JMM
3.B-Hop
4.Calderon
5.Vazquez
6.Mosley
7.Cotto
8.Darchinyan
9.Hatton
10.Marquez/Pavlik!!!!!!!

Personally I think Cotto should be at 4 or 5.
Cotto beat Mosley...so he should be at least in front of him, as for Cotto being #1 if he beats Pac(thats if Pac beats Hatton) then I believe he would easily beat JMM..thats why I feel he would deserve the spot.

[Pullcounter]

I definetly agree with you.

1 thing tho. Why people say Cotto is not top 10 P4P anymore. Just because the ring Magazine list doesnt have him? because if yoiu ask me that list is Garbage.

This is what the top 10 should look right now
1.Pacquaio
2.JMM
3.B-Hop
4.Calderon
5.Vazquez
6.Mosley
7.Cotto
8.Darchinyan
9.Hatton
10.Marquez/Pavlik!!!!!!!

I would put Cotto back on the top 10 only if the NVSAC ruled that margo cheated against cotto and cotto's L turned into a NC. otherwise I see no reason why a win over jennings would put him back on the p4p list.

[dondi330]

*Yawn* There you go with your plaster **** again. Don't you have anything new to talk about??

Yeah ...the other sentence you conveniently ignored, while you were so focused on the plaster....duh!

[Mr. Fantastic]

Personally I think Cotto should be at 4 or 5.
Cotto beat Mosley...so he should be at least in front of him, as for Cotto being #1 if he beats Pac(thats if Pac beats Hatton) then I believe he would easily beat JMM..thats why I feel he would deserve the spot.

For beating Micheal Jennings??? I don't think so. Now lets say if he were to beat a Clottey or a PW or a Margarito in a rematch, then you have a case. But now, that looks like complete nuthuggery.

[dondi330]

For beating Micheal Jennings??? I don't think so. Now lets say if he were to beat a Clottey or a PW or a Margarito in a rematch, then you have a case. But now, that looks like complete nuthuggery.

I dont believe one win or loss is what puts you in the P4P list or takes you off...thats how I drew my conclusions.
Im sorry, did anyone even mention Jennings? or is his name echoing in your hollow head from something someone mentioned about him yesterday?
As for Margarito (and remember YOU brought him up) Cotto shouldnt allow him the payday