Best win of Marquez's career?

[Flab]

Wrong quote.

I just did.

[Chups]

the judge admitted to the scoring error

I wish they would overturn that...........that would undoubtly make Pac a 5 division Champ.

[DarchinyFAN]

So that L next to the Chris John fight stands for "Win", can't call a loss a win. You can say I that you think it was wrong, but the rules are if you go the full 12 judges give their opinions, so unless there was a scoring error, well.......

[Steak]

So that L next to the Chris John fight stands for "Win", can't call a loss a win. You can say I that you think it was wrong, but the rules are if you go the full 12 judges give their opinions, so unless there was a scoring error, well.......

thats ******. there are robberies in boxing, and thats the truth.

thats like not giving Lewis that first win over Holyfield, despite the fact he very clearly won. or saying that Sven Ottke went legitimately undefeated in his career. its baloney.

Now, I dont know if John-Marquez was a clear cut robbery or not. Ive never seen it. but a good majority of people seem to have it for Marquez, so I thought I should include it.

[STEELHEAD]

when he beat pacquiao in the second fight!!!

[Reggie Miller]

Juan Diaz.

[DarchinyFAN]

thats ******. there are robberies in boxing, and thats the truth.

thats like not giving Lewis that first win over Holyfield, despite the fact he very clearly won. or saying that Sven Ottke went legitimately undefeated in his career. its baloney.

Now, I dont know if John-Marquez was a clear cut robbery or not. Ive never seen it. but a good majority of people seem to have it for Marquez, so I thought I should include it.

Doesnt matter, we cant just go back and make up history.

You can put a loss or a draw into context, and you can call it a robbery, when telling someone about it you can say the referee or judges majorly ****ed up, but you can't go back and call it a win for the guy who lost.

Boxing is a sport it has rules, and if it goes 12 unless there is an error its still a loss. I mean I have never heard evidence that judges were paid off or John packed his gloves with plaster for that fight, so its just a bad decision. Still a loss.

[Pullcounter]

when he beat pacquiao in the second fight!!!

it never happened.

[warp1432]

Going with Marco Antonio Barrera by a hair. That win was not controversial at all by the way. He beat Barrera a lot clearer then he beat John (which was still pretty damn clear).

Barrera was coming off wins of Morales, Fana, Peden, and Juarez twice.

Juan Diaz comes very close though. Diaz is a better win then Casamayor.

[MaYaN_SuN]

To date?

It has to be Casamayor and Diaz, which is crazy since the biggest wins of Marquez' career came at ****in lightweight lmao. The guy is savage.