Which was the more devastating KO?

**Crazylegs77** · 03-01-2009, 02:24 AM

damn hard to say both were pretty brutal, but Banks was slumped in the corner so I voted banks, then again Diaz almost went out of the ring!

Nah Banks.

**Dice** · 03-01-2009, 02:25 AM

I still say Lorenzo/Miranda was more devastating but Banks/Adamek takes this poll.

**�ringer** · 03-01-2009, 02:25 AM

Both of them were great, but I liked the Marquez KO better for numerous reasons.

A.) It was a much better fight overall than Adamek/Banks

B.) It was a much higher level than Adamek/Banks

C.) It was a much more punishing type of fight. Battles like that take years off of your career.

**�ringer** · 03-01-2009, 02:26 AM

Originally posted by Crazylegs77

damn hard to say both were pretty brutal, but Banks was slumped in the corner so I voted banks, then again Diaz almost went out of the ring!

Nah Banks.

Diaz almost went out of the ring on his face.

**The Gambler1981** · 03-01-2009, 02:26 AM

Adamek for sure that was pure devestation. JMM was great also though, you really can not make a wrong choice here.

**savorduhflavor** · 03-01-2009, 02:28 AM

It's gotta be Marquez/Diaz. Diaz was OUT.

But what really makes it is the legendary fight that preceded it, and the caliber of fighters. Considering what was at stake, what a huge fight it was, and how much hype it got, that puts it over the top.

I know when judging KO's that stuff shouldn't matter, but for me I can't look past the huge relevance of the KO.

**-Boxzilla-** · 03-01-2009, 02:29 AM

they were both devestating ... jmm > 4 bringers reasons though...

**larryx** · 03-01-2009, 02:29 AM

man that last uppercutt jmm landed was in the words of wladowns"brutal"

**Dice** · 03-01-2009, 02:30 AM

I gotta disagree saying all that extra stuff makes the Marquez ko better to me just says the Marquez fight was better.

As for the actual knockout I thot Adamek leveled Banks more then Marquez did Juan although I wish i had video of Lorenzo's ko

Which was the more devastating KO?