Juarez vs John

[No10Point]

Good first round for us.
But same thing for the Cambel fight...

[zemoG]

Fight judging is all in the eye of the beholder. Ignorent at home scoring usually involves people using punchstat numbers and **** that judges do not get.

It shouldn't be. That's the whole point. There is a defined way on how to judge a fight and judges should know it. It shouldn't be a matter of gut instincts or feeling on a round. It should be as objective as possible; which is where most people/judges fail.

[Pullcounter]

john got robbed of a W... atleast he keeps his belts

[No10Point]

Get over it Fight is gone We are on the next.

Got this one even.
Shields asking to box already? Those body shots scaring Sheilds?

[The Gambler1981]

It shouldn't be. That's the whole point. There is a defined way on how to judge a fight and judges should know it. It shouldn't be a matter of gut instincts or feeling on a round. It should be as objective as possible; which is where most people/judges fail.

There is no way to take a bias out of a human's eyes though. It is who YOU think won the round. 10 people all watch the same thing in the ring and you may get 10 different ideas about what happeaned.


Judges are human.

[No10Point]

Uh is it just me or is Marqyez blocking 98% of Diazs punches?

[zemoG]

There is no way to take a bias out of a human's eyes though. It is who YOU think won the round. 10 people all watch the same thing in the ring and you may get 10 different ideas about what happeaned.


Judges are human.

The point is to remove the human element. That is why there are rules on how judges are supposed to award rounds...

They aren't supposed to think: "Well who do I think won that round?" They're supposed to watch and examine and use the layout on proper judging and it should point to the right winner. There is human error and it's not gonna' be 100% accurate, but good judging isn't something that should be as hard as some of you mouth breathers make it out to be.

[The Gambler1981]

Also scoring fights at home from a tv is vastly different then scoring a fight live. Keep that in mind.

[The Gambler1981]

The point is to remove the human element. That is why there are rules on how judges are supposed to award rounds...

They aren't supposed to think: "Well who do I think won that round?" They're supposed to watch and examine and use the layout on proper judging and it should point to the right winner. There is human error and it's not gonna' be 100% accurate, but good judging isn't something that should be as hard as some of you mouth breathers make it out to be.

People put different emphasis on different aspects. Clean effective punches are the most important thing, but Jaurez was the one that landed the bigger flashier punches all night. Look at my posts from during the fight, I was seeing a much closer fight then everyone else.

John was aggressive throwing a lot of shots, and some people really favor aggression. I have no beef with anoyne saying John won. I just think it was a close fight and a draw was fair.

A draw seemed fine to me.

[Don Johnson]

No way in hell juarez won, it was a robbery. I only gave Juarez the 11, 9, 8. The rest to John. Terrible hometown cooking.