Chad Dawsons victory over Adamek is more impressive than any Calzaghe W

[Check]

Think about it. Adamek is a lot like Kessler when you talk strictly records, both only losing to the two men I am comparing. The difference is Adamek is now taking on and has beat top contenders in the div(if you think Mundine is more established than Cunningham thats your opinion I guess). So, the Adamek win trumps that. Also Adamek is youthful, stronger, and just more prime than BHOP. At this point right now I think Adamek would beat Hop so that also tops that victory too. Chad in his short career has a better victory in Adamek than Calzaghe in his whole career.

[mathed]

Think about it. Adamek is a lot like Kessler when you talk strictly records, both only losing to the two men I am comparing. The difference is Adamek is now taking on and has beat top contenders in the div(if you think Mundine is more established than Cunningham thats your opinion I guess). So, the Adamek win trumps that. Also Adamek is youthful, stronger, and just more prime than BHOP. At this point right now I think Adamek would beat Hop so that also tops that victory too. Chad in his short career has a better victory in Adamek than Calzaghe in his whole career.

Why do sooo many people hate a guy who is has done nothing wrong?
Calzaghe did not fight Dawson nor Cunningham; I honestly think that he would beat both-hence in my opinion your post is rendered invalid as well sir. See how easy it is to make fiction/opinion fact? These are your posted opinions, not facts----anything could have happened.

It almost sounds as if you are mad that he is not still fighting.....are you a closet Calzaghe fan?

[The Hammer]

Why do sooo many people hate a guy who is has done nothing wrong?

The amount of hate Joe receives is completely unjustified.

B-Ron, let's not forget Adamek was weight-drained and sick when he fought Dawson.

[Check]

Why do sooo many people hate a guy who is has done nothing wrong?
Calzaghe did not fight Dawson nor Cunningham; I honestly think that he would beat both-hence in my opinion your post is rendered invalid as well sir. See how easy it is to make fiction/opinion fact? These are your posted opinions, not facts----anything could have happened.

It almost sounds as if you are mad that he is not still fighting.....are you a closet Calzaghe fan?

Well, Joe may of beat them, who really knows. The point of this thread is not if Joe could beat them, its more so that a win over Adamek trumps Kessler, Eubank, or 44 year old BHOP. It is my opinion and I am entitled to it, just like you are to yours but I can't see any reason for anyone to believe that Kessler is greater than Adamek at this point in their careers. Bhop you can make an arguement for I guess.