Juan Lascano or Malignaggi who is better??
Collapse
-
the paulie that turned up to face hatton was not the best paulie malignaggi - in fact i think wev only seen the best of paulie a handful of times, if he wants to be go as far as his undoubted talent can take him then he has to really up his performances. his last 2 performances have both been well bleow what he can offer.
if the paulie that faced hatton turns up and fights lazcano he might lose, but both fighters lose to bradley and juan urango.Comment
-
Comment
-
The sad thing is there is two breaks in the action between lazcano landing two good shots and Lazcano getting warned and Hatton was the one attacking after the second break.
Hatton deservedly won that round on 2 of the three cards.Comment
-
Comment
-
perhaps thats karma trying to bite the lad in his ass. dont forget that he's made a career out of HOLDING AND HITTING.
IMO he got way too much time to recover. He was clearly dazed and about to go down.Comment
-
HELLO!!! he was already recovered and initiated the attack before the warning.
Lazcano wasn't holding and hitting he was PUSHING Hattons head down and Hitting, thats clearly a foul and results in a warning in ANY fight.Comment
-
Paulie is on another level to lazcano
Juan was a good fighter probably one of the better fighters never to win an alphabet title
Hatton was a bad style match up for Malignaggi, id still pick paulie over most of the other belt holders at 140. Kendall holt would be tough for himComment

Comment