What will happen to All-Time-Great Lists 100 years from now?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Libido Sanchez
    American Me
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 2905
    • 239
    • 604
    • 12,566

    #1

    What will happen to All-Time-Great Lists 100 years from now?

    There's been a lot of great fighters in the last 100 years and there will be countless more in the next century.

    I know it's fun to make and debate ATG lists, but what do you think people living in 2109 will do when they make their Top 100 and they have twice the number of fighters to consider?

    Will some great fighters be left off lists simply because there's no room? Or will only the true best make it on people's lists? Will people in the future look down on our current best the same way we sometimes downplay the achievements of the old-timers?

    What do you think?
  • THE REED
    Sixty Forty
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 43489
    • 1,992
    • 1,483
    • 690,068,075

    #2
    THey will have a new top 100.... which will contain.... the too 100.

    Comment

    • hammerhiem
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 4877
      • 129
      • 102
      • 11,163

      #3
      I don't care, i'll be dead.

      It's entirely possible there won't BE a legitimate boxing scene in 100 years.

      Comment

      • Thwf
        Banned
        • Dec 2008
        • 368
        • 13
        • 6
        • 461

        #4
        Originally posted by Libido Sanchez
        There's been a lot of great fighters in the last 100 years and there will be countless more in the next century.

        I know it's fun to make and debate ATG lists, but what do you think people living in 2109 will do when they make their Top 100 and they have twice the number of fighters to consider?

        Will some great fighters be left off lists simply because there's no room? Or will only the true best make it on people's lists? Will people in the future look down on our current best the same way we sometimes downplay the achievements of the old-timers?

        What do you think?
        Where`s that damned list, I have yet to see one after all these centuries. Link ???

        People debating about the ATG list, it doesn`t exist yet, right?

        Comment

        • Libido Sanchez
          American Me
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2009
          • 2905
          • 239
          • 604
          • 12,566

          #5
          Originally posted by Thwf
          Where`s that damned list, I have yet to see one after all these centuries. Link ???

          People debating about the ATG list, it doesn`t exist yet, right?
          The more I think about it, I think All-Time Favorite Fighters (and Reasons Why) are probably better lists. The ATG debates always get messy. I mean people can't even agree on Floyd, one boxer.

          But, you're right. "All Time" Greatest List can't technically happen... until every great fighter in time has fought! Ha ha.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP