This topic ain't fun, it's tired. If JMM wants to beat Pac, he better learn to keep his ass off the canvas and he could do it. He lost twice.
Agreed on all points. Respect to Marquez, he is definitely one of my favorite fighters, but in my opinion he didn't quite do enough. I don't care what "boxing experts" say, they are not always right, and I'm sure if we look around we can see plenty that thought Pac won. I laugh at "experts". They pick Lacy to beat Calzaghe, or Pavlik to beat Hopkins... their opinions are no better than mine. In fact, most of the time, they are worse.
Pacquiao was robbed in their first fight, the judge admit for their mistakes. pacman win the first fight clearly drop JMM several times to the canvas. JMM did not do enough in the second fight pacman drops him again.
JMM following the shadow of pacman. he beat old dog casamayor and he should fight opponent better than diaz.
I am a very lucky guy. I had the honor of being there with great seats live. The judged clearly F'D un and Aknowledged that in there first fight. The second fight every one at ringside where on the fence. In both fights I gave it to Pac by a single point. Not a robbery. It is a heated arguement and a fight that could have been called either way. Robbery doesn't warrent a great fight by 2 HOF boxers. It was a close fight.
I took my cousin with me to his first fight that happened to be Pac/JMM 1. I told him that both fighters had great chins so we went and put a good chunk of money on it going a full 12 rounds. The first round he was telling me that I don't know **** about boxing and how he wasted his money for 3 minutes of boxing on the ticket and the bet. Round by round went by as I was salivating at the mouth cuz of the greatness of the fight and greatness of my pockets. Now whenever he talks about boxing he says I went to that Pacman/Marquez 1 fight sat 3rd row for free.
I am a very lucky guy. I had the honor of being there with great seats live. The judged clearly F'D un and Aknowledged that in there first fight. The second fight every one at ringside where on the fence. In both fights I gave it to Pac by a single point. Not a robbery. It is a heated arguement and a fight that could have been called either way. Robbery doesn't warrent a great fight by 2 HOF boxers. It was a close fight.
I took my cousin with me to his first fight that happened to be Pac/JMM 1. I told him that both fighters had great chins so we went and put a good chunk of money on it going a full 12 rounds. The first round he was telling me that I don't know **** about boxing and how he wasted his money for 3 minutes of boxing on the ticket and the bet. Round by round went by as I was salivating at the mouth cuz of the greatness of the fight and greatness of my pockets. Now whenever he talks about boxing he says I went to that Pacman/Marquez 1 fight sat 3rd row for free.
how were u able to get that close to the ring? where do u get ur tickets? i want some for the hatton fight.
Pacquiao was robbed in their first fight, the judge admit for their mistakes. pacman win the first fight clearly drop JMM several times to the canvas. JMM did not do enough in the second fight pacman drops him again.
JMM following the shadow of pacman. he beat old dog casamayor and he should fight opponent better than diaz.
Who's better than Diaz? Nate was unavailable and Manny is fighting Hatton. He already beat the other great LW left in Casamayor. JMM is a beast.
Comment