Brook vs Jennings

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • S A M U R A I
    Bulletproof
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 181694
    • 1,495
    • 1,324
    • 1,419,318

    #21
    Good fight. I'd certainly like to see it. No a bad matchup at all.



    100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

    Comment

    • P4P Opinion
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2008
      • 1778
      • 143
      • 73
      • 8,170

      #22
      Originally posted by smokeyjackson
      well if they are his best 3 opponents and your saying he has fought at a better level than Micky then you have no idea, but its a deal, and when Micky wins i want an apology as well, Bradley Pryce isnt doing to bad is he and Micky has a win over him ,the current European champ got schooled off Micky, a complete shut out if i remember right think thats beats Mcyntyre, and Elwell give me a ****in break i can see your quite fond of Kell Brook and he is a good fighter for the future but he is at least 18 months of yet, just my opinion and ive seen more than 3 of his fights, get ready to be pointless mate
      No, you really haven't read what I've said have you? You're making the number one problem people on BS make. You're reading what I've said and presuming I also mean something else with it. I haven't once said that Brook has fought better opponents than Jennings, I've said he's fought someone of equal ability and I stand by that. It's an opinion. I've said that based on natural ability, Brook is a class above. Sure I'll give you an apology if Jennings wins, provided you give me an apology now for saying I've said something I haven't.

      Anyway, the bet is on. Sig it.

      Comment

      • S A M U R A I
        Bulletproof
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 181694
        • 1,495
        • 1,324
        • 1,419,318

        #23
        Is there any point in sigging a bet for a fight that might never happen?



        100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

        Comment

        • P4P Opinion
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2008
          • 1778
          • 143
          • 73
          • 8,170

          #24
          Originally posted by S a m u r a i
          Is there any point in sigging a bet for a fight that might never happen?
          Possibly not. If it becomes clear at one point that they aren't going to fight (ie, Brook fights a World class opponent) then I'll take it down. The fight has been talked about in a few places anyway including the Setanta website, so I imagine there is a good chance it'll happen.

          Comment

          • smokeyjackson
            Contender
            • Feb 2005
            • 185
            • 20
            • 1
            • 6,522

            #25
            Originally posted by P4P Opinion
            No, you really haven't read what I've said have you? You're making the number one problem people on BS make. You're reading what I've said and presuming I also mean something else with it. I haven't once said that Brook has fought better opponents than Jennings, I've said he's fought someone of equal ability and I stand by that. It's an opinion. I've said that based on natural ability, Brook is a class above. Sure I'll give you an apology if Jennings wins, provided you give me an apology now for saying I've said something I haven't.

            Anyway, the bet is on. Sig it.
            ok my apologies, lets hope Mr Warren gives the fans what they want and puts this fight on, i shall be having a word with Micky to have a word in Warrens ear,


            My 13k to P4P Opinion`s 30k that Jennings beats Brook should if they ever fight.
            Last edited by smokeyjackson; 02-23-2009, 03:12 AM.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP