Does noone here realize Pavlik is 6'3 and AA is 5'9?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Zocalo
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 2169
    • 51
    • 144
    • 8,453

    #11
    What amazing insight...

    Comment

    • genialus75
      Banned
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Jun 2007
      • 77
      • 3
      • 0
      • 141

      #12
      Originally posted by Dan Saleamua
      That is a six inch difference. Pavlik never got exposed. He had a bad night against a legendary, hall of fame fighter. A man who is naturally bigger. He should be saluted for having balls.

      AA is much shorter. I don't know where everyone gets the idea that he will easily KO Kelly. When they fight, I hope AA comes out in his usual ****** costume, with his ****** European techno music, and gets his ****** ass KTFO.
      man, hagler was 5'9" and hearns was 6'1"...
      pacquiao was 5'6" and jorge solis and oscar de la hoya was 5'10"
      floyd jr was 5'8" and corrales was 6'1"

      its not all about size man... there is technique, speed and chin...

      Comment

      • warp1432
        the mailman
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2007
        • 14406
        • 478
        • 347
        • 24,060

        #13
        Originally posted by KILLA RIGHT
        Yeah thats exactly why he is the bigger man. You just proved ur self wrong bro. If u have seen these fights live u can tell who is the bigger man b hop is the bigger man no doubt..p will has a way bigger reach and height advantage then aa but aa is the bigger fighter...Think about it was hearns bigger then tyson?
        A 10 pound difference is not that big of a difference, while Pavlik even said the weight fit him comfortably. 2 fights prior, Pavlik fought at 164. That's only 6 pounds difference. Add another 0 onto that 6 and that's Hearns vs Tyson comparison. That argument is ****** because it's a DRASTIC weight advantage. Not a small one like Pavlik-Hopkins.

        Hopkins fought at Middleweight for about 15 years. I'd like to see Pavlik when he's 43 make 160. He can't.

        Hopkins always stayed in shape and was a natural middleweight. He didn't have to lose 15 or so pounds like Pavlik did going into camp because he was always in shape.

        Pavlik is taller then him. He has bigger arms then him.





        They are pretty close to the same size, but Pavlik is bigger.

        Comment

        • genialus75
          Banned
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Jun 2007
          • 77
          • 3
          • 0
          • 141

          #14
          hearns was a very, very powerful puncher... he had a one punch KO power with his right... but hagler's chin was made from an alien substance! talk about immovable object outclassing the unstoppable force...

          Comment

          • No10Point
            Up and Comer
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Nov 2008
            • 45
            • 0
            • 0
            • 6,055

            #15
            Funny
            I just posted in another thread that even though I have it a close call fight I edge it towards Pavlik for height,reach, and style. AA hits a bit harder but ina hook. Pavlik fights tall as usual. Stays on the outside. Turning the jab over into a slight hook every no and then. AA's chance is to catch Pavlik pulling out.

            Definately want this fight becuase all other in the MW
            division are useless.

            Comment

            • dc6112
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Oct 2007
              • 1059
              • 50
              • 10
              • 7,849

              #16
              Originally posted by genialus75
              man, hagler was 5'9" and hearns was 6'1"...
              pacquiao was 5'6" and jorge solis and oscar de la hoya was 5'10"
              floyd jr was 5'8" and corrales was 6'1"

              its not all about size man... there is technique, speed and chin...
              Arthur Abraham's name belongs nowhere near Hagler's, Paquiao's, or Floyd's. There's a difference between all time greats and a guy who a couple fans think is pretty good.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP