Cotto Missing, Nowhere To Be Found

**IwatchBoxing** · 02-19-2009, 06:27 PM

I don't think he was on there, to begin with...

**JuanmaHurtMe** · 02-19-2009, 06:43 PM

Originally posted by Bhopreign

Your Thoughts?

Boxrec Pound For Pound

1 Bernard Hopkins light heavyweight
2 Vic Darchinyan super flyweight
3 Chad Dawson light heavyweight
4 Juan Manuel Marquez lightweight
5 Manny Pacquiao light welterweight
6 Shane Mosley welterweight
7 Israel Vazquez super bantamweight
8 Kelly Pavlik middleweight
9 Ricky Hatton light welterweight
10 Celestino Caballero super bantamweight
11 Wladimir Klitschko heavyweight
12 Rafael Marquez super bantamweight
13 Vitali Klitschko heavyweight
14 Denkaosan Kaovichit flyweight
15 Hozumi Hasegawa bantamweight
16 Daisuke Naito flyweight
17 Nonito Donaire flyweight
18 Arthur Abraham middleweight
19 Chris John featherweight
20 Ulises Solis light flyweight
21 Felix Sturm middleweight
22 Edgar Sosa light flyweight
23 Alexander Munoz super flyweight
24 Paul Williams light middleweight
25 Lucian Bute super middleweight

Paul Williams??? Ahahahaha.....

Felix Sturm?

Cotto is better than 90% of that list p4p easily.

Maybe it's a list of dudes that kinda suck?

**andrewcuff** · 02-19-2009, 06:53 PM

Well they've got Pacquiao at #5 for a start. Kinda shows how poor the list is. Even worse when they've got Darchinyan & Dawson as #2 & #3 respectively.

**mmaphilippines** · 02-19-2009, 06:56 PM

He should fight Mosley to regain his belt again. But I agree the list is kinda poor

**2501** · 02-19-2009, 06:57 PM

The list isn't compiled by a panel of analysts, pundits or so called experts. I believe its by a points system or some ****.

**BG_Knocc_Out** · 02-19-2009, 06:58 PM

That list seems kind of ****. Hopkins at number 1? I understand that he looked great against Pavlik, but that was only one phenomenal performance of his in the past 8 years, which really shouldn't put him in the number 1 spot. Vic as 2nd? Dawson as 3?!?!?!?! Pavlik as 8? Pavlik shouldn't even be in the top 15, why is Wlad only at 11? He should be within the top 7 atleast. But this is all my opinion.

**The Gambler1981** · 02-19-2009, 07:01 PM

It is based on a computer formula, I could not even begin to explain how their system works. It is suprising that Cotto is not on there though because 1 loss does not generally hurt a fighter that much, atleast in the division rankings (as seen by the often strange divisional rankings, JLC ranked 12 at 147 for example).

**The Gambler1981** · 02-19-2009, 07:03 PM

Yea according to them Cotto has 837 points, and Bute who is ranked 25 has 1041. It is all based off who has the most points according to them.

**120** · 02-19-2009, 07:05 PM

yeah boxrec is not the best resource for this...for me is only good to search on past events. I don't even look for future fights in there, most of the time they put things way too early and end up having to remove it

Cotto Missing, Nowhere To Be Found