Which is more disgraceful to the sport? Biting, Loaded Gloves or Steriods?

[BMWM3P]

who do you think the alt is?

I don't know yet, but he was posting in another thread about which fans left after a fighter lost.

[El Chicano]

No they made him take off extra layers of gauze that was designed to protect his hands more than allowed

Big fcuking difference.

No, they made him take off the extra layers of guaze AND tape designed to create a HARDER wrap. AND they made him remove the tape that was applied DIRECTLY to his knuckles which also creates the base for a HARDER wrap.

[boxaholic]

Biting is not something that Tyson planned on doing. Just a reaction to getting FU#@ed up by Holyfied and his head.

Steroids you are hurting yourself in the long term.

Loaded Gloves is premeditated, can really hurt your opponent just look at Cotto's face. Loaded Gloves needs to be a automatic 2 year suspension and 25% of your fight earning for that fight.

[Spacey1991]

All of them are dangerous... but I picked loaded gloves, they are the most dangerous.

Steroids - They are performance enhancers and make it so you are a much better athlete than usual... in which you have a massive advantage on your opponents which can cause harm (hard to explain, but you get the drift). It also makes the sport look bad.

Biting - Rarely does any really bad permanent damage but can still hurt and/or cut or opponent which in a fight while getting hit can be made worst... also it is an absolutely dirty move and makes Boxing look bad.

Loaded Gloves - While hitting an opponent it make more impact which can cause permanent damage very easily... e.g. blurred sight, brain damage, skull damage, etc. It makes it so each punch feels harder than it is and can give opponents bad cuts which can get a lot worst... it also makes the sport look bad.

All three of them are terrible, dirty, cowardly things to do and make the sport look bad, but I chose loaded gloves because I think it has more chance to cause permanent damage than taking steroids or biting does.

[Left2body]

BS thread Margarito HAD loaded gloves Tito did not. Why do Mexicans insist on trying to lump Tito with Margarito.

[Spacey1991]

BS thread Margarito HAD loaded gloves Tito did not. Why do Mexicans insist on trying to lump Tito with Margarito.

I don't see why people need to bring Margarito into it, yeah he did a really bad thing and all but it is a simple question... what do people think is worst, it could do with a simple straight forward answer without bringing Margarito into it (by the way I am not saying you brought it up).

You get what I mean though don't you?

[Left2body]

I don't see why people need to bring Margarito into it, yeah he did a really bad thing and all but it is a simple question... what do people think is worst, it could do with a simple straight forward answer without bringing Margarito into it (by the way I am not saying you brought it up).

You get what I mean though don't you?

I know what you mean but I don't care if they bring specific examples of things its not my thread. My gripe is that the original topic is based on a false premise which infers that Margarito and Tito are the same when they are nothing alike.

See what I mean? My objection is one of substance where something is False is presented as true based on ignorance....your objection is purely a matter of form.

[Dan...]

LOLOL. Loaded gloves and it is not even close. At all.

[El Chicano]

BS thread Margarito HAD loaded gloves Tito did not. Why do Mexicans insist on trying to lump Tito with Margarito.

It's funny how you all are in denial when it comes to Tito, but wish death upon Tony cuz he put the whoopin' of a lifetime on Cotto. If Margarito would have lost to Cotto you all Cotto-Nuthuggers wouldn't even care that he tried to cheat against Mosley. You guys are too funny.

Accept it, Tito tried to cheat against B-Hop cuz he knew he was in for an asswhoopin'.

Have a nice day

[Spacey1991]

I know what you mean but I don't care if they bring specific examples of things its not my thread. My gripe is that the original topic is based on a false premise which infers that Margarito and Tito are the same when they are nothing alike.

See what I mean? My objection is one of substance where something is False is presented as true based on ignorance....your objection is purely a matter of form.

Yeah, I get what you mean mate... they both did different things, the only thing people see the similarity in is that they were both doing something t there wraps that are illegal in Boxing... it doesn't mean they are the same you are right.

Glad we cleared that up anyway!