pacquiao will not ko hatton idiots.......

[a-raines21]

that's some really ******ed logic.

how is my logic ******ed?

[Mersey]

I don't think Hatton will be KO'd but I see him losing by UD

[hammerhiem]

45-1 against who?

"he aint fight 44 floyd mayweathers. cuz if he did hed be 0-44"

hes fought such limited oppisition.....

Any LWW and below would be 0-44 against mayweather you twat.

Jesus since when does losing to the P4P #1 make you flawed and ****?

fcuking ******ed.

[Sin City]

how is my logic ******ed?

Hatton is just as good now then he was then.. If that's the case then Mayweather's win against Genaro is **** because Oscar got to him first, so is the win over De La Hoya because Tito got to him many many many years earlier before him and in his prime, as well as everyone else on his record other then Chico and Hatton.

[billionaire]

Hatton is not a master at holding when he is hurt though see Mayweather fight.

if you think pacquiaos as good as mayweather because he beat dlh your nuts!!!

[a-raines21]

Any LWW and below would be 0-44 against mayweather you twat.

Jesus since when does losing to the P4P #1 make you flawed and ****?

fcuking ******ed.

first off ***** boy his style is flawed.....i never said anything about his loss, but i did say he has fought limited opposition, which explains y he gets ktfo on the elite level

second of all ***** boy, he leaps to the inside insead of workng his way in with the jab, which isnt smart considering his shaky chin.

third of all ***** boy, he has poor footwork. all he can do is come foward, get inside, and hope to tire u out with wresting. we see what happens when he tires.

so yessss...... ricky hatton is very flawed

[a-raines21]

Hatton is just as good now then he was then.. If that's the case then Mayweather's win against Genaro is **** because Oscar got to him first, so is the win over De La Hoya because Tito got to him many many many years earlier before him and in his prime, as well as everyone else on his record other then Chico and Hatton.

well i have a question..... didnt tito beat oscar on sone bull****?

did oscar or floyd really knock hernandez out?

did u not see the difference in roy jones after he was first knocked out?

do u not think that marg will be a different fighter now that hes been ktfo? cotto? jermain taylor?

my logic is not what is flawed, its your interpretation that needs work sir

[hammerhiem]

first off ***** boy his style is flawed.....i never said anything about his loss, but i did say he has fought limited opposition, which explains y he gets ktfo on the elite level

second of all ***** boy, he leaps to the inside insead of workng his way in with the jab, which isnt smart considering his shaky chin.

third of all ***** boy, he has poor footwork. all he can do is come foward, get inside, and hope to tire u out with wresting. we see what happens when he tires.

so yessss...... ricky hatton is very flawed

For fcuks sake thats like saying Sonny liston was Flawed because he lost to Ali...

Limited oppostion? He's beaten two guys ranked top 10 P4P, he's been KO's ONCE by the P4P #1.

you sir are fcuking crazy.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

if you think pacquiaos as good as mayweather because he beat dlh your nuts!!!

what's that got to do with Hatton's ability or inability to hold when hurt?

[a-raines21]

For fcuks sake thats like saying Sonny liston was Flawed because he lost to Ali...

Limited oppostion? He's beaten two guys ranked top 10 P4P, he's been KO's ONCE by the P4P #1.

you sir are fcuking crazy.

once agiain to the dumb illiterate fucks who dont understand plain english

ricky hatton's style is flawed...... the record is simply a reflection of who hes faced......

he fought a fighter in his prime, and who was true elite, and he got ktfo......

simple