Stop saying Nate won round 3

[Bhopreign]

ROUND 1: 10-9 Campbell
ROUND 2: 10-8 Campbell
ROUND 3: 10-9 Funeka
ROUND 4: 10-9 Funeka
ROUND 5: 10-9 Funeka (close)
ROUND 6: 10-9 Funeka

Every round is clear as glass thus far except round 5, which I'll admit was close

Nah now I know youre not looking close, because Funeka never had a clear round, those punches are mostly on Nate's arms. Besides clean punching is only one aspect of judging, if youre not willing to factor in the other three criteria, youre wasting your time, because the judges ARE factoring in those other three criteria.

[Bhopreign]

Don't tell me about punches to the arms because I recognize it when I see it. Castillo, for example, hit nothing but Mayweather's arms all night in their first fight. This was completely different. Nate did next to nothing while Funeka landed all sorts of punches, double hooks to the head and body, straight rights and a constant jab

Again clean punches are only one aspect of scoring a round, what about the fact Nate threw less and landed more. Dont forget about defense, ring generalship and effective aggression.

[DiegoFuego]

oldgringo, you claim you had Nate winning round 7 or 8. I'd love to know which because I've scored them both as clear Funeka rounds, especially round 8.

[OnePunch]

oldgringo, you claim you had Nate winning round 7 or 8. I'd love to know which because I've scored them both as clear Funeka rounds, especially round 8.

In case nobody told you this, in the pros, body shots count.

Here's your analysis of a typical exchange......

Funeka throws 5 shots, Nate picks off 4 of them with his gloves and forearms, and cracks 2 hard shots to the body. By your account, Funeka wins the exchange.


This is why you shouldnt score pro fights. You use amateur criteria.


Funeka threw more, and landed less.
Nate threw less, and landed more.
Who is more "effective"? The guy with the 27% connect ratio, or the guy with the 49% connect ratio and the harder shots?

You should go back and just change every one of your posts to "I hate Nate, so the fix must have been in". Either that, or learn to score a fight. 8-4 Funeka shows you are without a doubt completely ******ed.

[warp1432]

I had Funeka winning round 3. The cloest round was round 10, which could have gone either way. I had the fight a draw, so if I scored round 10 for Funeka, Funeka would have won on my card.

I don't have a problem with the decision, but certainly no more then 114-112 for Nate.

[Owlzfan84]

i agree. I gave him 1, 2, 10 11, 12. Which i believe with the knockdowns makes it a draw on my card.

No way you could give him round 3.

[warp1432]

i agree. I gave him 1, 2, 10 11, 12. Which i believe with the knockdowns makes it a draw on my card.

No way you could give him round 3.

Exactly the same card I had.

[sylvestersweet]

1) Campbell 10-9
2) Campbell 10-8
3) Funeka 10-9
4) Funeka 10-9
5) Funeka 10-9
6) Funeka 10-9
7) Funeka 10-9
8) Campbell 10-9
9) Funeka 10-9
10) Funeka 10-9
11) Campbell 10-8
12) Campbell 10-9
113-113 draw

[Kball15]

Nate won the fight IMO, and round 3 was really close. I hate how DiegoFuego states all his opinions as facts.

Funeka had just been KD'd and hadnt found his groove yet. Almost every punch he through in that round was blocked.