You're a moron if you think Funika got robbed

[damian5000]

Nate swept the first 3 and last 3 rounds and had 2 KD's.. That's 114-112 / 114-111 right there. It doesn't get simpler than that. Basic math.

[ИATAS]

News flash: not everyone scored the fight the same way, so it's not basic math.

Anyways, I picked Ali to win and I was going for him, but it obviously wasnt a robbery. I think it should have been a draw or one point victory for Ali. It was very close and I would have been satisfied with either way or a draw.

[Johnny Awesome]

Agreed OP. I see people whine about this. Nate landed more and knocked him down twice. He did sweep the first and last 3 rounds.

[warp1432]

Round 10 was the swing round. Round 3 should have been score for funeka.

[lest26]

was a draw in my opinion, i dont think he was better than nate but just worked harder and a little more consistant so could easily have gone funikas way, not sure how one judge had it so clearly in nates favour though

[legitballa77200]

cambell fought a great fight against a tough fighter . it was close but definitly not a draw . there were two 10/8 rounds and from what i saw ali didnt do enough to overcome that .a lot of his punches were hitting glove and getting blocked by cambell in the earlier rounds.

[Sweet Pea 50]

Nate swept the first 3 and last 3 rounds and had 2 KD's.. That's 114-112 / 114-111 right there. It doesn't get simpler than that. Basic math.

Be nice if you at least got the guys name right, FFS.......

[-Boxzilla-]

ya in no way can this be considered a robbery....

[MANGLER]

When you score KD's in a close fight, you usually win. Not a robbery.

[The Fix]

Nate swept the first 3 and last 3 rounds and had 2 KD's.. That's 114-112 / 114-111 right there. It doesn't get simpler than that. Basic math.

personally, i had it the same as you....