Did Margarito Cheat against Cotto? Official Poll!

[MaFu MoFo]

The old bloody spot found on the wrap means the "thing" was used previously. Agaisnt whom??? That is the quetion. But probably Cotto. The plaster also hurts the fighter wearing it. The blood stain had to be Margarito's and from a previous fight. The "thing" was removed before the Mosley fight. Who did Tony punched with it before that night??? Huummm, Cotto.

[BMWM3P]

He got cleared of any previous fights its been decided no he did not. And what makes this thread official?

You're still butthurt over what Cotto did to Zab.

[DrewWoodside]

You're still butthurt over what Cotto did to Zab.

Zab judah pwned some dude in a street fight though.. he'll always have that.

[Pullcounter]

The old bloody spot found on the wrap means the "thing" was used previously. Agaisnt whom??? That is the quetion. But probably Cotto. The plaster also hurts the fighter wearing it. The blood stain had to be Margarito's and from a previous fight. The "thing" was removed before the Mosley fight. Who did Tony punched with it before that night??? Huummm, Cotto.

that's possible, but halloway accused margo of using the pads in sparring, so it could be a pad from sparring with rashad and not a pad used in the cotto fight.

truthfully no one can know for sure

[Left2body]

that's possible, but halloway accused margo of using the pads in sparring, so it could be a pad from sparring with rashad and not a pad used in the cotto fight.

truthfully no one can know for sure

Dude thats is horrible logic right there. Your telling me that a fighter will use loaded gloves in a sparring session (where it dont mean ****) but not against a fighter where winning or losing means millions?

The blood stain means it was used previously, meaning not first time.

The funniest thing is that Margarito CANNOT say that he didn't use loaded gloves against Cotto.

[DrewWoodside]

Dude thats is horrible logic right there. Your telling me that a fighter will use loaded gloves in a sparring session (where it dont mean ****) but not against a fighter where winning or losing means millions?

The blood stain means it was used previously, meaning not first time.

The funniest thing is that Margarito CANNOT say that he didn't use loaded gloves against Cotto.

Well there defense is a bit contradicting as I think I've heard it. Capetillo and Margarito claim whatever they did was innocent they didn't know any better, this is how they always wrap the hands.. Which means that if they always do it like that then they cannot deny that they wrapped the hands like that against Cotto. I think ultimately Margs is ******.

[Allucard]

I already did this thread a couple weeks ago back before it came out that the substance was illegal. Now that it seems Margarito will be suspended and Margarito's trainer has admitted to foul play.. We can all vote with some solid information. Who thinks Margarito cheated against Cotto? Remember Margarito came into the fight with Mosley as a heavy favorite and came into the fight with Cotto as an underdog. I know that it is impossible for us to know for sure, but vote what you THINK actually happened. Discuss. Poll to follow!

I voted yes but matter of fact is it can't be proved so this is redundant at best.

[legitballa77200]

how could he have not known what was being place on his wraps.
is it possible to do anything otherwise while getting wrapped . besides picking his nose , reading a book , grabbing some ass , praying with his eyes closed.
theres nothing to do but sit there and watch your hands being wrapped. theres no credibility in his story nor his trainers let alone the csac and nsac.

[MaFu MoFo]

that's possible, but halloway accused margo of using the pads in sparring, so it could be a pad from sparring with rashad and not a pad used in the cotto fight.

truthfully no one can know for sure

It doesn't make sense. Capetillo knew about the wrap, period. Tony did not throw a punch before his hands were wrapped that night before he fought Mosley. It's not only that they were cought cheating that night, but the bloody stain is evidence that the "thing" was used previously and I don't believe it was used while sparring. Tony cheated. PLAIN and BASIC COMMON SENSE.

[Pullcounter]

Dude thats is horrible logic right there. Your telling me that a fighter will use loaded gloves in a sparring session (where it dont mean ****) but not against a fighter where winning or losing means millions?

The blood stain means it was used previously, meaning not first time.

The funniest thing is that Margarito CANNOT say that he didn't use loaded gloves against Cotto.

You can't prove that margo loaded his gloves against cotto, but rashad has given testimony that margo loaded his gloves in sparring.

its possible that margo loaded his gloves against cotto, but there is no evidence or testimony to back that up.

its possible that margo loaded his gloves against rashad in sparring, and there is testimony to back that up.

All I'm saying is that there is atleast testimony (whether true or false) of loaded gloves in sparring against rashad, while there is no evidence or testimony of loaded gloves against cotto.

therefore the bloodstain could be from the sparring session and not the cotto fight.

Margo can say he didnt use loaded gloves against cotto because there is no evidence or testimony that he did.