Who would win in a rematch Donaire or Vic?

[brick wall]

any fighter who knocked out another fighter should be favored to win in a rematch unless it was a lucky punch that won for him or the loser had an off night. in the case of donaire and darchinyan, the punch that ko vic was a well timed left hook and he was losing the fight even before the ko came.

[gopi11]

I guess you have a compulsion about being right... sad
The objective of these threads are not to see who is right or wrong but to discuss possibilities.

First of all I don't believe I have a deep boxing knowledge, you did by what you said mockingly in your last thread. My point was that in some instances when a boxer moves up in weight sometimes they loose some speed.
Donaires best attribute is his speed, and I'm just wondering if he goes up in weight again will that affect him speed wise.
I'm beginning to think you are biased, possible because he is one of your countrymen? You've given almost no credit towards Vic.

Just to be fair, Vic's style is tailor made for Donaire, but he is devastating against almost anybody. He did improved his defense, and his movements, but not to sway me around if he decide to fight Nonito again. His weaknesses are still there, and I think Nonito is the man who can exploit Vic's weaknesses, I have a feeling Gary Shaw feels the same way too.

We will never know if Donaire's style is tailor made for somebody until he meets that boxer in the ring. It could Montiel or Mares or somebody else lurking around the gyms somewhere, but that Vic/Nonito fight was so conclusive to me that I couldn't see it going any other way.

But what do we know in boxing? That's why they fight the fights...

[vegeta23]

No probably you are the one that needs to educate yourself, you cannot call Donaire adventurous given the simple fact that he's not inclined to choose his fights, his manager does.

And no adventurous does not mean out of the norm.
Look it up.


Look bottom line Donaire is a good fighter but that was then, Vic has shown a lot of progress. Do you think Donaire could have taken on Mijares and beaten him in a similar fashion? Just because Vic lost to him once doesn't mean he'll do so again. Just look at Pac, Morales beat the **** out of him and their rematch was whole different story. Maybe if you were a little open minded you would see that Vic has a chance in defeating Donaire.

You forget the fact that Donaire knocked Vic out with one punch.He will beat him again.

[DUnknown1]

If a chess game was annotated like one player played "adventurous" in the opening, it meant he deviated, he went against the book lines, he played a novelty, out of the norm.

Sorry to burst you bubble...

No, it means it would be a dangerous, risky or an uncertain move, you're trying to link in adjectives until you come out with your own words.
Second your sentence is wrong, you cant play "adventurous". That's a noun.
You are using a noun to describe a verb. You meant adventurously
, that would make it an adverb and then it would correspond with your sentence.
Why do I even bother?
You know what since it means so much to you, adventurous means whatever your brilliant little head wants it to be.

[DUnknown1]

But seriously though, all kidding asside
I guess we will never know for sure until we have a rematch. Hopefully it will happen.