Login or Sign Up
Logging in...
Remember me
Log in
Or
Sign Up
Forgot password or user name?
Log in with
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
Galleries
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Member List
Calendar
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
Galleries
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Member List
Calendar
Home
Forum
Boxing Forums
Non Stop Boxing
Does the Hopkins of 2001 beat the Hopkins of 2008?
Collapse
Sign in or register here to comment
X
Collapse
Posts
Latest Activity
Photos
Sign In / Register
Page
of
3
Filter
Time
All Time
Today
Last Week
Last Month
Show
All
Discussions only
Photos only
Videos only
Links only
Polls only
Events only
Filtered by:
Clear All
new posts
Previous
1
2
3
template
Next
-----------
-----------------
Join Date:
Dec 2006
Posts:
6207
Received
414
Given
742
Points:
12,799
Share
Tweet
#1
Does the Hopkins of 2001 beat the Hopkins of 2008?
02-06-2009, 09:12 AM
Well?
Hopkins states Pavlik is his best win.
...........................
EDIT : By the way, this is P4P.
32
Voters
Hopkins of 2001 beats the Hopkins of 2008.
68.75%
22
votes
Hopkins of 2008 beats the Hopkins of 2001.
31.25%
10
votes
Last edited by
-----------
;
02-06-2009, 09:18 AM
.
Chr0nic
Banned
Join Date:
Oct 2008
Posts:
4501
Received
191
Given
213
Points:
5,494
Share
Tweet
#2
02-06-2009, 09:14 AM
felix trinidad tko and keith holmes ud > sd loss to calzaghe and ud over pavlik
Comment
Post
Cancel
Testdead
Banned
Join Date:
Nov 2008
Posts:
2094
Received
47
Given
11
Points:
2,287
Share
Tweet
#3
02-06-2009, 09:14 AM
Hopkins 08 is way too savy.
Comment
Post
Cancel
boxasmash
Undisputed Champion
Join Date:
Aug 2008
Posts:
7039
Received
222
Given
63
Points:
14,591
Share
Tweet
#4
02-06-2009, 09:15 AM
hopkins 08 wins.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Testdead
Banned
Join Date:
Nov 2008
Posts:
2094
Received
47
Given
11
Points:
2,287
Share
Tweet
#5
02-06-2009, 09:15 AM
Originally posted by
megadude
felix trinidad tko and keith holmes ud > sd loss to calzaghe and ud over pavlik
lol.
Tito was a great 160`r as was Keith Holmes.
Where are the mods.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Chr0nic
Banned
Join Date:
Oct 2008
Posts:
4501
Received
191
Given
213
Points:
5,494
Share
Tweet
#6
02-06-2009, 09:17 AM
**** I CLICKED ON THE 08 BEATS 01
and to testdead, and pavlik? and calzaghe, was'nt he better at super-middle weight also? i think he was
Comment
Post
Cancel
Sugar May Floyd
Banned
Join Date:
Jan 2009
Posts:
1025
Received
38
Given
17
Points:
1,233
Share
Tweet
#7
02-06-2009, 09:17 AM
Prime Tito at 160> Pavlik 170
Pavlik struggled with Taylor at 168 and showed weight might have been a issue in that weight. Tito KO’d Joppy at 160
Tito fight was more devastating
Comment
Post
Cancel
IMDAZED
Fair but Firm
Join Date:
May 2006
Posts:
42644
Received
1,134
Given
1,770
Points:
67,152
Share
Tweet
#8
02-06-2009, 09:18 AM
Hell yes. That version was just as savvy, just as excellent defensively but threw way, way more punches.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Southpawkiller
Contender
Join Date:
Oct 2008
Posts:
282
Received
15
Given
2
Points:
6,382
Share
Tweet
#9
02-06-2009, 09:30 AM
2001 bhop wins
2001 hopkins would win as he wud have a much higher punch output...
Comment
Post
Cancel
boxasmash
Undisputed Champion
Join Date:
Aug 2008
Posts:
7039
Received
222
Given
63
Points:
14,591
Share
Tweet
#10
02-06-2009, 09:53 AM
Originally posted by
Sugar May Floyd
Prime Tito at 160> Pavlik 170
Pavlik struggled with Taylor at 168 and showed weight might have been a issue in that weight. Tito KO’d Joppy at 160
Tito fight was more devastating
pavlik @160 beats prime tito at 160.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Sign in or register here to comment
Previous
1
2
3
template
Next
Working...
Yes
No
OK
OK
Cancel
😀
😂
🥰
😘
🤢
😎
😞
😡
👍
👎
☕
TOP
Sign In
USERNAME
PASSWORD
Forgot password?
Remember Me
SIGN IN
Register
Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
JOIN NOW
Comment