3 fighters ..what number do you rank them 1-100 honestly
Collapse
-
I generally try and stay away from ranking current or recent fighters in all time lists. Really need a few years to see how their careers and the careers of their top opponents play out. Also, it takes a few years for your emotions to subside and take a real critical look at what they did.
Whitaker 30-50
(around 30 is definently my cieling on him, the floor might actually be slightly higher than 50, but I could be convinced anywhere in that range)
Pacquiao 20-40
(This is alittle bit on speculation especially in the case of the cieling, because if I made a alltime p4p list this moment he certainly wouldnt be #20, that win against Hatton would certainly help.)
Mayweather 50-70Comment
-
Niether was Leonard.
I dont think he would. Duran could not handle lateral movement. Chavez and Nelson were just as ferocious as Duran and they could not pin Whitaker down.Comment
-
Agreed 100%.
I'm tired of talking to these newbies, man. It's frustrating. If I have to break down Pea's resume, I have to break down Chavez's, then Nelson's yada yada.Comment
-
Comment
-
Hagler having 13-14 straight defenses doesn't make him higher.
Pernell had 10 defenses at 135 (not including non-title bouts), and unified. In higher divisions he beat McGirt, Chavez, Vasquez, and on and on and on.
Sigh...Comment
-
Is this based on how good they are/were or their standings in history
Skills
1. Floyd
2. Pea
3. Pacquiao
Overall accomplishments
1. Pea
2. Pacquiao
3. FloydComment
-
Comment
Comment