why do haters always bring up the castillo fight??

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Guest
    • 0
    • 0
    • 0

    #61
    I knew Floyd stans were sensetive, but now they're taking it to a new level.
    I don't know if I'm dealing with fans, or bitches.

    Comment

    • Fulcrum29
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 4171
      • 171
      • 44
      • 4,430

      #62
      Originally posted by $ Lord13 $
      I show a fact.
      You call me names.
      What does that mean?
      I speak truth, you can't handle it.
      the only fact in this thread is that mayweather owned castillo twice. check boxrec if you're unsure ****.

      the only other possible fact in this thread is you're a butt-hurt sore loser and you're utterly squirming in bitterness at being owned so now you're just resorting to ad hominem attacks and changing the subject in order to save face and deaden the effect of your ownage. haha ****.

      Comment

      • larryx
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 13892
        • 225
        • 108
        • 15,442

        #63
        Originally posted by Fulcrum29
        there's a reason lederman is just a ***** who gets 2 seconds of air time every 5 rounds because he don't have the skillz to be a damn judge. who cares what he had the fight, all 3 judges had mayweather-castillo 1 like 116-111 which is OWNAGE
        yes because they saw the counters floyd was landing and the punches castillo wasnt landing

        Comment

        • Fulcrum29
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 4171
          • 171
          • 44
          • 4,430

          #64
          Originally posted by $ Lord13 $
          I knew Floyd stans were sensetive, but now they're taking it to a new level.
          I don't know if I'm dealing with fans, or bitches.
          jesus we got you so stunned and shellshocked from your ownage you can't even spell right.

          "floyd's stans" and "sensetive?"

          you are truly OWNED.

          Comment

          • larryx
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2008
            • 13892
            • 225
            • 108
            • 15,442

            #65
            Originally posted by $ Lord13 $
            I knew Floyd stans were sensetive, but now they're taking it to a new level.
            I don't know if I'm dealing with fans, or bitches.
            man shut the **** up..you sound ignorant

            Comment

            • Guest
              • 0
              • 0
              • 0

              #66
              Originally posted by Fulcrum29
              jesus we got you so stunned and shellshocked from your ownage you can't even spell right.

              "floyd's stans" and "sensetive?"

              you are truly OWNED.
              You don't know what a stan means?
              You sound like a bright one...

              Comment

              • Fulcrum29
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2008
                • 4171
                • 171
                • 44
                • 4,430

                #67
                Originally posted by larryx
                yes because they saw the counters floyd was landing and the punches castillo wasnt landing
                furthermore it's bad to go just by one judge like lederman because he has only one vantage point. 3 judges in a boxing card all sit at 3 different sides of the ring for a reason because they get all different vantage points to make it even so when you have all 3 judges giving the same score and one idiot like lederman giving something else then chances are it's the idiot that's wrong

                Comment

                • THE REED
                  Sixty Forty
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 43489
                  • 1,992
                  • 1,483
                  • 690,068,075

                  #68
                  why do we have to be haters to think floyd lost the first fight?

                  thats the real question.

                  Comment

                  • Fulcrum29
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Aug 2008
                    • 4171
                    • 171
                    • 44
                    • 4,430

                    #69
                    Originally posted by $ Lord13 $
                    You don't know what a stan means?
                    You sound like a bright one...
                    do you know what "sensitive" means or are you 12 years old and mommy never bought you that dictionary you wanted for christmas?

                    Comment

                    • larryx
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • May 2008
                      • 13892
                      • 225
                      • 108
                      • 15,442

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Fulcrum29
                      furthermore it's bad to go just by one judge like lederman because he has only one vantage point. 3 judges in a boxing card all sit at 3 different sides of the ring for a reason because they get all different vantage points to make it even so when you have all 3 judges giving the same score and one idiot like lederman giving something else then chances are it's the idiot that's wrong
                      people believe any card that has their fighter winning..even if the other 1000 cards say he lost..floyd won a ud,,,not a sd a ud

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP