I show a fact.
You call me names.
What does that mean?
I speak truth, you can't handle it.
the only fact in this thread is that mayweather owned castillo twice. check boxrec if you're unsure ****.
the only other possible fact in this thread is you're a butt-hurt sore loser and you're utterly squirming in bitterness at being owned so now you're just resorting to ad hominem attacks and changing the subject in order to save face and deaden the effect of your ownage. haha ****.
there's a reason lederman is just a ***** who gets 2 seconds of air time every 5 rounds because he don't have the skillz to be a damn judge. who cares what he had the fight, all 3 judges had mayweather-castillo 1 like 116-111 which is OWNAGE
yes because they saw the counters floyd was landing and the punches castillo wasnt landing
yes because they saw the counters floyd was landing and the punches castillo wasnt landing
furthermore it's bad to go just by one judge like lederman because he has only one vantage point. 3 judges in a boxing card all sit at 3 different sides of the ring for a reason because they get all different vantage points to make it even so when you have all 3 judges giving the same score and one idiot like lederman giving something else then chances are it's the idiot that's wrong
furthermore it's bad to go just by one judge like lederman because he has only one vantage point. 3 judges in a boxing card all sit at 3 different sides of the ring for a reason because they get all different vantage points to make it even so when you have all 3 judges giving the same score and one idiot like lederman giving something else then chances are it's the idiot that's wrong
people believe any card that has their fighter winning..even if the other 1000 cards say he lost..floyd won a ud,,,not a sd a ud
Comment