Calzaghe Diehard Stans, Come In Here. *Dawson Related*
Collapse
-
-
That was a humiliating performance from Woods. Utter ****e.Comment
-
im comparing
Joe fought Hopkins and Jones...
Hopkins was understandable, jones wasnt.
Dawson fought Tarver and Johnson..
both were understandable... besides hopkins, they were the two top fightersComment
-
Comment
-
What one or another person picks is irrelevant. I didn't give Hopkins much of a shot because of his age, lack of activity and lack of offensive dexterity. On the other hand, I had delusions of grandeur where Jones could turn back the clock.
That doesn't change the general consensus.Last edited by IMDAZED; 02-03-2009, 02:56 PM.Comment
-
yeah right LOL.... go find that post... id like to see it for myself...
I SAID, countless times.. if roy has something left, i think he could be joe... well he didnt have anything left, and he lost...
ON TOP OF THAT... even IF I DID, think Roy was going to beat Joe... how the hell does that make Roy still relevant to fight?
Because "I" thought he could win?
No.Comment
-
yeah right LOL.... go find that post... id like to see it for myself...
I SAID, countless times.. if roy has something left, i think he could be joe... well he didnt have anything left, and he lost...
ON TOP OF THAT... even IF I DID, think Roy was going to beat Joe... how the hell does that make Roy still relevant to fight?
Because "I" thought he could win?
No.Comment
-
yeah right LOL.... go find that post... id like to see it for myself...
I SAID, countless times.. if roy has something left, i think he could be joe... well he didnt have anything left, and he lost...
ON TOP OF THAT... even IF I DID, think Roy was going to beat Joe... how the hell does that make Roy still relevant to fight?
Because "I" thought he could win?
No.
I think there were 10 million reasons to fight Jones. And, rightly or wrongly - Calzaghe thinks his legacy is secure, and so do the majority of the British boxing fans.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment