If it's proven that Marg used plaster against Cotto should Cotto's loss be changed

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • J.R.
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 214
    • 7
    • 0
    • 6,257

    #11
    Originally posted by vaborikua
    If it's proven that Marg used plaster against Cotto should Cotto's loss be changed to a NC and he should be undefeated again?
    Well the Nevada comission already said his wraps were fine so I don't think that's going to be happening. Althouh if it is found out that he cheated than yes the result should be changed to a NC. Don't count on that happeing though.

    And like someone already said, Shane's win over De La Hoya in their 2nd fight should be changed as well. If you're gonna **** Margo, then **** Shane as well.

    Comment

    • Pullcounter
      no guts no glory
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2004
      • 42582
      • 549
      • 191
      • 49,739

      #12
      i doubt they can prove margarito cheated against cotto

      Comment

      • CottoTopWWfact
        Banned
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Jan 2009
        • 66
        • 12
        • 0
        • 125

        #13
        Originally posted by Howlin' Wolf
        Tito's win over Vargas should be changed to a NC..
        that was some of the most shaddiest **** ever.
        where it not for all those nut shots Vargas could have won.
        Not to mention the fact that Tito's cheating paved the way to the demise of Vargas..
        that and De La Hoya knocking his block off too.
        If Vargas fought Tito 100 x He would lose 101 x. Vargas was NOT on Tito's level. Tito was not even hurt against Vargas. Being off balance from a shot does not equate to being "hurt."

        For the record: Chavez was the king of the low blows. Margarito hit Cotto with 4 low blows.

        Mexican Boxing is dead for at least 10 yrs. You got NO prospects in sight other than Victor Ortiz.

        Bums.

        Comment

        • AztecWanker
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 5331
          • 401
          • 505
          • 6,208

          #14
          abner mares ****s on your post

          Comment

          • Mr. Ryan
            Guest
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2004
            • 23437
            • 1,301
            • 1,090
            • 29,664

            #15
            Originally posted by Howlin' Wolf
            Duran never low blowed Buchannan! That **** was right on the belt line.
            If his trunks were hanging off his taint, then yes.

            Comment

            • Caxcan
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2008
              • 2664
              • 273
              • 96
              • 23,228

              #16
              Originally posted by CottoTopWWfact
              If Vargas fought Tito 100 x He would lose 101 x. Vargas was NOT on Tito's level. Tito was not even hurt against Vargas. Being off balance from a shot does not equate to being "hurt."

              For the record: Chavez was the king of the low blows. Margarito hit Cotto with 4 low blows.

              Mexican Boxing is dead for at least 10 yrs. You got NO prospects in sight other than Victor Ortiz.

              Bums.
              Tito fought like he was on the level of Vargas' sack judging by all the low blows. it's a shame he had to resort to that **** in order to turn the tide.... otherwise he would have lost to not one but two chicano fighters

              Comment

              • PlasticFlamingo
                Interim Champion
                • Jan 2009
                • 922
                • 16
                • 27
                • 7,050

                #17
                The only reasonable way to establish a convincing case would be to force Margarito to take a lie test if he is found guilty now. Nevertheless, those can be cheated as well.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP