Naz is comparing Tito to Margarito? what?
Collapse
-
-
Dude, no disrespect, but the writing is there, clear as day.Fair enough, I was a little annoyed at the "can you read" thing, you came off as pretty arrogant there.
Anyway, this is the first time any kind of "substance" has been mentioned, and it happens seven years after the fight took place.
Again, when this story unfolded it was about too much wrap, nobody said anything about an illegal plastic or plaster like material.
Thats why I asked if you could read. I wasn't trying to be arrogant at all. I think some people read the headline, and immediatley jumped to conclusions without taking the time to actually read it.
I think its a pretty interesting comment for him to make though. As has been stated earlier today, what are the thoughts going to be if Margarito is cleared of wrongdoing? Will people believe it, or will they just say that the matter was brushed aside?
Obviously, Tito was cleared of any wrongdoing, but Richardsons comments make for some very intriguing drama regarding the situation.
Some people could takes Naseems words and easily say the matter was brushed aside as well.
As a fan of the sport first and foremost, it pains me this has to even happen.Comment
-
Yes you are.
You even asked if I'm calling Naz a liar, as if you presuppose what he said to be true, but it's a lie. Trinidad had no foreign objects in his gloves. Period.Comment
-
Wow, I guess you really can't read.
I never said anything about Titos gloves.
I simply provided the comments that Richardson made himself. And I asked if you're calling Richardson a liar, because I'm asking if you're calling Richardson a liar.
Everyone but you can see that.
Comment
-
And then if he says yes. then you will say how come he is laying about tito, but not about margarito. Good try!!!!!!!!!!!!Wow, I guess you really can't read.
I never said anything about Titos gloves.
I simply provided the comments that Richardson made himself. And I asked if you're calling Richardson a liar, because I'm asking if you're calling Richardson a liar.
Everyone but you can see that.

Comment
-
For sure, bro. I didnt mean to be all ***** about it, lol. Just took it the wrong way.Dude, no disrespect, but the writing is there, clear as day.
Thats why I asked if you could read. I wasn't trying to be arrogant at all. I think some people read the headline, and immediatley jumped to conclusions without taking the time to actually read it.
I think its a pretty interesting comment for him to make though. As has been stated earlier today, what are the thoughts going to be if Margarito is cleared of wrongdoing? Will people believe it, or will they just say that the matter was brushed aside?
Obviously, Tito was cleared of any wrongdoing, but Richardsons comments make for some very intriguing drama regarding the situation.
Some people could takes Naseems words and easily say the matter was brushed aside as well.
As a fan of the sport first and foremost, it pains me this has to even happen.
Anyway as far as I have known this is the first this has ever been mentioned, the Tito handwrap story was brushed off by most as little more than gamesmanship.
And I agree with you, it sucks to see **** like this is still going on in our sport in the 21st century.Comment
-
You can read my mind now?
Not once until this article came out have I mentioned Titos name.
IMO, Titos already been cleared of speculation by the proper authorities.
I just find Richardsons comments quite interesting.
I don't know when you cats are going to learn, but I'm as objective as they come.
Prior to right now, I haven't said anything to suggest I was in favor of his comments.
I am however, in favor of the ruling that cleared Trinidads name from any wrongdoing.Comment
-
Yeah man, you got it. I can't read. You did'nt insinuate a belief in what Naz said. You can simply dismiss me by asking wheather or not I can read.Wow, I guess you really can't read.
I never said anything about Titos gloves.
I simply provided the comments that Richardson made himself. And I asked if you're calling Richardson a liar, because I'm asking if you're calling Richardson a liar.
Everyone but you can see that.

Comment
-
Comment
-
My bad then!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You can read my mind now?
Not once until this article came out have I mentioned Titos name.
IMO, Titos already been cleared of speculation by the proper authorities.
I just find Richardsons comments quite interesting.
I don't know when you cats are going to learn, but I'm as objective as they come.
Prior to right now, I haven't said anything to suggest I was in favor of his comments.
I am however, in favor of the ruling that cleared Trinidads name from any wrongdoing.Comment
Comment