what's more dangerous? gloves with handwraps, or no wraps?

[boxingsmash69]

What do you think would be more dangerous,

getting hit by a 8oz/10oz professional fight glove, with a bare fist inside the glove,

or

wrapped hands under the gloves.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

cement hurts....................

[P4PKING2008]

Handwraps are to protect your hands not to add weight to punches.

[The Gully Gad]

Cement hurts indeed
Add that to the mullet and thats like having petrol around a fire

[ИATAS]

Handwraps are to protect your hands not to add weight to punches.

Say that to Tito

[Sin City]

the handwrap itself doesn't make much of a difference unless it is padded with heavy material. if anything wrapping your hands softens the blow a little bit I believe.
certain ways of wrapping hands like layering with tape will harden the blow though..
then when you use plaster.. your hands are some deadly ass weapons.
I wouldn't recommend fighting without wraps though.. you are gonna more then likely brake your hand.

[Sin City]

Say that to Tito

I don't think Tito was every found guilty of illegaly wrapping his hands..

[DoomCity202]

no wraps are dangerous for your hands.

[Deeznuts]

Bare hands of course

[boxingsmash69]

the handwrap itself doesn't make much of a difference unless it is padded with heavy material. if anything wrapping your hands softens the blow a little bit I believe.
certain ways of wrapping hands like layering with tape will harden the blow though..
then when you use plaster.. your hands are some deadly ass weapons.
I wouldn't recommend fighting without wraps though.. you are gonna more then likely brake your hand.

hmmm...

but, what about no handwraps, would it be more damaging getting hit when the knuckles aren't wrapped at all? I would think yes, but the chances of hand injury would rise high.