Fighter of the decade
Collapse
-
he lost.
it might have been close because it was such a DULL fight but it was a clear loss.
close fights can be clear.
people are under the misconception than a clear loss has to be a blowout.
example......pac-morales 1. it was a close fight but it was a CLEAR loss for pacquiao.
But I wouldn't call a very close, highly contested bout that ended in a SD that many disagreed with - a "clear" loss.
There was nothing "clear" about Hops/Zags, if anything, it was anticlimactic.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
BOYS, with a year to go before the decade ends, who do you think should be fighter of the decade?
HOPKINS- undisputed middleweight champion with 20 successful defenses, a schooling of oscar de la hoya, antonio tarver and kelly pavlik ...
MAYWEATHER jr- superb boxing skills with incomparable defense... championships in five different weight classes and an undefeated record
CALZAGHE- undisputed super middleweight champion (regardless of politics) and lineal light heavyweight champion who is also undefeated...
PACQUIAO- a former flyweight champion who has a TKO win over a former middleweight titlist... championships in five different classes (regardless of politics)
2) hopkins - got beat a few times, but takes on challenges
3) floyd - he needs to fight mosley and cottoComment
-
Yep. If pac wins against hatton impressively and PBF makes Pac look like an ordinary fighter when/if they fight and beats the lineal welterweight champ, Floyds the FOTD in my opinion.Comment
Comment