Boxing's Triangle Theory

[twanky1]

What are some famous triangle theories and why do they work?

Ill start.

Cotto>Mosley

It was a close fight anyway but a bad style clash for mosley because Cotto could land as mosley pulled away.

Margarito>Cotto

Cotto didnt go to the body enough, Marg took Cottos legs with bodyshots. I honestly think that this was the difference

Mosley>Margarito

I predicted the outcome and the exact way it would happen. Does anybody remember those MONSTER right hands that Shane landed on Mayorga? I knew he was going to land these on the Big, Slow and open Margarito. He even finished it with the same left hook he nailed Mayorga with.

People say Mosley struggled against Mayorga, I couldnt dissagree more. He looked quite good, especially becase Mayorga is a messy, lunging, clinching fighter.

[Pullcounter]

What are some famous triangle theories and why do they work?

Ill start.

Cotto>Mosley

It was a close fight anyway but a bad style clash for mosley because Cotto could land as mosley pulled away.

Margarito>Cotto

Cotto didnt go to the body enough, Marg took Cottos legs with bodyshots. I honestly think that this was the difference

Mosley>Margarito

I predicted the outcome and the exact way it would happen. Does anybody remember those MONSTER right hands that Shane landed on Mayorga? I knew he was going to land these on the Big, Slow and open Margarito. He even finished it with the same left hook he nailed Mayorga with.

People say Mosley struggled against Mayorga, I couldnt dissagree more. He looked quite good, especially becase Mayorga is a messy, lunging, clinching fighter.

I thought mosley would;ve beaten cotto if the fight was in vegas so this triangle theory isnt the best.

[NAPO]

I thought mosley would;ve beaten cotto if the fight was in vegas so this triangle theory isnt the best.

No. the fight was close because alot of rounds could of gone either way i saw cotto win 8-4. mosley most clear rounds were the 3rd and the 9th. cotto clear rounds were 1,4,5,11. the rest were either way. cotto won clearly.

[Mr. Philadel]

I didnt have Cotto beatin' Shane....like someone said, in Vegas or Cali that decision would've been different

[KnockoutTheFat]

Cliff Couser > Monte Barrett

Don't know how that happened

Monte Barrett > Domanick Guinn

Got outworked

Domanick Guinn > Zuri Lawrence

Well Lawrence didn't exactly have enough power to hurt him...

Zuri Lawrence > Jameel McCline

Lawrence took advantage of McCline's stamina issues

Jameel McCline > Shannon Briggs

Briggs couldn't land the punch

Shannon Briggs > George Foreman

OK he didn't really win the fight but w/e

George Foreman > Joe Frazier

Fire met fire, George's fire was too much

Joe Frazier > Muhammad Ali

By this logic, Cliff Couser > Muhammad Ali

[twanky1]

Well I scored the fight and I had Mosley losing by 2 rounds to Cotto and thats with me biased towards Mosley as he is one of my favourite fighters.

[twanky1]

Jones>Hopkins

Too active, too good.

Tarver>Jones

Brutal 1 punch KO

Hopkins>Tarver

Tarver was weight trained and his slashing, spurt fighting style was perfect for Hopkins

[twanky1]

Taylor>Hopkins

Taylor was too active for Hopkins although it was a close fight

Pavlik>Taylor

Style clash that made Pavlik's long sledgehammer punches the factor in the fight

Hopkins>Pavlik

Hopkins dismantles the young pavlik.

[twanky1]

bumpeddddddddd

[Flawless.]

I thought mosley would;ve beaten cotto if the fight was in vegas so this triangle theory isnt the best.

Agreed ...............