Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

All NEW NSB rules!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Richard Wagner View Post
    lolz, you forgot to put that if the fight goes the distance, the loser was either 'schooled and exposed' if the losing fighter lost by more than 3 rounds, and if it is less than three rounds then it is clearly a 'robbery'.

    It's also essential to make as many threads about these fights as possible, even if you have to log in as your alt account and make an identical thread.
    Actually depending on the fighter one guy can potentially be "schooled" despite winning. For example Ricky Hatton was "schooled" by Collazo and Joe Calzaghe was "schooled" by Bernard Hopkins. It is thus not only possible but an absolute certainty that a losing fighter can be "schooled". Like Margarito was against Paul Williams.

    Comment


    • #12
      Every thread involving a fighter in the 147 division should mention Floyd Mayweather.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
        Actually depending on the fighter one guy can potentially be "schooled" despite winning. For example Ricky Hatton was "schooled" by Collazo and Joe Calzaghe was "schooled" by Bernard Hopkins. It is thus not only possible but an absolute certainty that a losing fighter can be "schooled". Like Margarito was against Paul Williams.
        I just checked your thread history after seeing your signature.. You've got a pretty strong resume of Pwning Tunney. The complete ownage is actually hilarious.

        Comment


        • #14
          Hitman's Holy Trinity Of NSB Truths:


          1. Anyone who likes a fighter of their own race is a racist.

          2.
          If your fighter quits in his corner it was "smart" If the other guy does it he is a "coward" and should retire.

          3. The first time you watch an old fight you have to start a thread stating you just "rewatched" it. Admitting you just watched a fight like DLH-Sturm for the 1st time is grounds for a premanent ban and clearly displays that you don't know anything about boxing.

          Comment


          • #15
            LOL good thread.

            Another truth: If you are primarily an inside fighter -You can't box for ****. Fact.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Sparked_1985 View Post
              LOL good thread.

              Another truth: If you are primarily an inside fighter -You can't box for ****. Fact.
              And if you're a boxer and get beaten by an in-fighter it was because you "let him do what he wanted" and you will easily win next time if you "just use your jab more"

              Comment


              • #17
                calzaghe is a murderous puncher! he has a 69 percent ko ratio! war calzaghe! he put manfredo 6 feet under!

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by daggum View Post
                  calzaghe is a murderous puncher! he has a 69 percent ko ratio! war calzaghe! he put manfredo 6 feet under!
                  Rule #1: Nobody ****s with Zsolt Erdei.

                  Rule #2: There are no more rules.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    This thread is win.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      - If you happen to like fighters of the opposite race, you're a disgrace to your own people.

                      - If you happen to like fighters from you're own race, you're a racist.

                      -If your top 3 favorite fighters are of the same race, you are biased... and cannot be trusted.

                      -If you are putting down a fighter of the opposite race, it is because you do not like the color of their skin... there can be no other logical reason.

                      -If you are putting down a fighter from another country, it is because you do not like their nationality... there can be no other logical reason.

                      -If you are undefeated, you are automatically an "ATG".

                      -If you've lost a fight, and avenged the loss... you have still been exposed, and are "overrated".

                      -If you're 5'11" or taller, you should not be a welterweight... it doesn't matter if you can make 147... height MUST be taken into consideration.

                      If an undefeated fighter loses a fight, he has been "exposed".

                      If a fight is close, somebody got robbed. Pure and simple.

                      If a fighter starts to lose near the end of their career... They never were, that good anyway.

                      If a fighter starts to lose near the beginning of their career... They never will be, that good anyway.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP