There is no proof that Marg used plaster in any other fight.

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Derranged
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2005
    • 46593
    • 2,126
    • 1,351
    • 162,628

    #1

    There is no proof that Marg used plaster in any other fight.

    You cant punish him for **** that you think he might have done... So all this his wins should be erased and Cotto should sue is kinda silly because there is no proof. Cotto would have no case.

    Unless somebody from Margs camp comes forward...

    He should be punished for what he tried to pull last night.
  • Fenom
    No Ceilings
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2008
    • 2663
    • 133
    • 77
    • 9,305

    #2
    lie detector test

    Comment

    • WaRCoTTo
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 1600
      • 48
      • 22
      • 1,819

      #3
      Originally posted by iBox4Real
      lie detector test
      Exactly...I made a thread..about this

      Comment

      • Allucard
        Undisputed Champion
        • Jun 2007
        • 5979
        • 393
        • 56
        • 12,399

        #4
        Originally posted by Derranged
        You cant punish him for **** that you think he might have done... So all this his wins should be erased and Cotto should sue is kinda silly because there is no proof. Cotto would have no case.

        Unless somebody from Margs camp comes forward...

        He should be punished for what he tried to pull last night.
        But somehow people feel ok to insinuate Mosley used Roids for this fight (although not saying it directly) even though his case remotes to year 2000, NINE years ago.

        Comment

        • bucketrd
          Up and Comer
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Jan 2009
          • 63
          • 11
          • 0
          • 6,108

          #5
          There is no proof he had plaster yesterday. All Naseem Richardson said was that his hands were illegally wrapped. Same as Tito's.

          Comment

          • THe TRiNiTY
            Sugar-Will O'-Hurricane
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2006
            • 10079
            • 405
            • 103
            • 17,986

            #6
            Lie detector tests are NOT used in trials for a reason.

            He can only be penalized for THIS fight. All there is to it.

            If a woman killed her husband, caught on tape and all of her other husbands have died, but there's no proof she did it, you can't just say, 'Hey, she did this one.... **** it. Let's get her for all of them.'

            Not how it works.

            Comment

            • Derranged
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2005
              • 46593
              • 2,126
              • 1,351
              • 162,628

              #7
              Originally posted by iBox4Real
              lie detector test
              Well... I didnt think of that. However, they are not 100% accurate, in fact they are inadmissible in court.

              There are ways to beat it, it could detect a "lie" just from one being nervous even if they tell the truth, and often the measurements on the graphs could be interpertative.

              Comment

              • javelin_fangs
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2008
                • 1622
                • 63
                • 0
                • 7,876

                #8
                Originally posted by Derranged
                You cant punish him for **** that you think he might have done... So all this his wins should be erased and Cotto should sue is kinda silly because there is no proof. Cotto would have no case.

                Unless somebody from Margs camp comes forward...

                He should be punished for what he tried to pull last night.
                What you say is true, but there's a lot of doubt about him now. He's definitely got some image rebuilding to do.

                Comment

                • The Gambler1981
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 25961
                  • 520
                  • 774
                  • 49,039

                  #9
                  As much as it suck as the probability of him cheating before is fairly high. There is really no proof that he did it in any other fight.

                  Hard to say how I feel about the rematch with Margarito now though, part of me says that Cotto should fight him again and make sure Margarito's wraps are clean so he can beat the piss out of him. Or if Cotto should just move on with his career and say **** you to Margarito.

                  Comment

                  • sylvestersweet
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 1791
                    • 46
                    • 67
                    • 8,114

                    #10
                    Marg would definitely pass a lie detector test, guilty or not.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP