Should margo go on trail for possibly using plaster in past fights

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bea5T
    Undisputed Champion
    • Sep 2007
    • 1718
    • 61
    • 16
    • 7,983

    #1

    Should margo go on trail for possibly using plaster in past fights

    ?

    He could of killed a man
  • Guest
    • 0
    • 0
    • 0

    #2
    Innocent until proven guilty.

    That's like when the cops pin every unsolved murder on one guy just because he's indicted for murder.

    same ****. unless someone has proof of past wrongdoing THEY should STFU.

    Comment

    • dajabgameisill
      Contender
      • Nov 2007
      • 210
      • 18
      • 1
      • 6,260

      #3
      its not proven ... it was caught and it was removed .... williams and clottey didnt fold like cotto soooooooooooooooooooooooo, no argument ...

      Comment

      • The Great Shark
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 3542
        • 295
        • 466
        • 4,021

        #4
        Well lets wait and see if in fact was plaster of paris or what ever that substance was first.

        Comment

        • Bea5T
          Undisputed Champion
          • Sep 2007
          • 1718
          • 61
          • 16
          • 7,983

          #5
          If hes innocent till provin gulty then he should hav no problem in trial

          Comment

          • The Great Shark
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 3542
            • 295
            • 466
            • 4,021

            #6
            You are jumping to conclusions, and making yourself look like an idiot. He doesn't need to go to trial when the commission already has the confiscated, questionable handwraps in their possession. He would only have to go to trial had they not had any proof, but in that case, there would be no allegations to go off of in the first place.

            Comment

            • Guest
              • 0
              • 0
              • 0

              #7
              Originally posted by Bea5T
              If hes innocent till provin gulty then he should hav no problem in trial
              You're assuming guilt. What if someone arrested you,etc for something you didn't do?

              It's a ****ty thing to do even if you are innocent.

              You see my point. right?

              Comment

              • MindBat
                floyd gobbler
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jun 2006
                • 16853
                • 571
                • 841
                • 25,210

                #8
                Since there wasn't any sheet rock to hang or repair at the arena, I think they should look into it further since no one from Team Margarito has come forward with an explanation to stop the rumors from flying.

                If the evidence was destroyed, then they'll have a hard time proving its validity.

                Otherwise, Margarito should be scrambling to put an end to it once and for all.

                Comment

                • MaYaN_SuN
                  Banned
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 4090
                  • 163
                  • 0
                  • 4,325

                  #9
                  Originally posted by elchinoloco
                  Well lets wait and see if in fact was plaster of paris or what ever that substance was first.
                  lol Exactly

                  Was it plaster? Or was it "like plaster" (which can be an over dramatic perception of what it really was.)

                  But as long as someone has it and is doin tests on it, thats good. I'm willin to bet it will be no more then another controversal hand wrap. Theres no way someone can get away with litterally turning their hands into some sort of rock. Not only that, but with the leverage Tony gets in his punches, he would be rackin up the KO's if that was the case.

                  Comment

                  • Bea5T
                    Undisputed Champion
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 1718
                    • 61
                    • 16
                    • 7,983

                    #10
                    Originally posted by elchinoloco
                    You are jumping to conclusions, and making yourself look like an idiot. He doesn't need to go to trial when the commission already has the confiscated, questionable handwraps in their possession. He would only have to go to trial had they not had any proof, but in that case, there would be no allegations to go off of in the first place.


                    But we DONT have proof he used it in past fights

                    Thats what we need to find out

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP