What is up with older boxer beating younger boxer

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BBNpodcast
    Banned
    • Jan 2009
    • 8
    • 1
    • 3
    • 27

    #11
    I'm a big fan of Hopkins. He is skillful, clever and such a canny fighter. Against Calzaghe, the fight was close, but from a fans perspective I'm glad Joe got the win because Hopkins' fights have had a tendancy to be thinking affairs of late, which won't draw people into the game.

    Comment

    • Ryn0
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Feb 2007
      • 11139
      • 310
      • 269
      • 20,767

      #12
      Originally posted by Flawless.
      JT?? Hopkins should have got the nod at least in one of the fights against JT. Kessler would get beat by Hopkins but not bad as Pavlik
      Hopkin should have gotten the nod in the first fight against JT the 2nd is argueable I thought he won both but w/e they were very close so i don't have a problem with people who scored for Taylor

      Comment

      • Flawless.
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 3534
        • 114
        • 60
        • 4,248

        #13
        Anyways Calzaghe is not a young fighter like Pavlik

        Comment

        • Boxingwizard
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2007
          • 4298
          • 126
          • 190
          • 12,228

          #14
          It has nothing to do with age, it's who is the better boxer.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP