Pacquaio Is the TOP DOG in the sport... HE DESERVES 60-40. PBFvs.Hatton PBF got 70-30

[Guest]

Im on my ps3 right now...playing madden so this will be my last response for at least a hour.

Let's use Common Sense.
If Hatton made 40 Million when he was guaranteed only 6 Million than he
must of Made 34 Million off of UK p.p.v buys..

But their is one problem. The sky sports only made 37 million for the Hatton mayweather fight.

So you are telling me that Hatton took 34 of 37 million dollars from sky sports???


Because I am pretty sure Hatton didnt get any U.S p.p.v money if Floyd didnt get any Uk p.p.v money...

My last response too. That is irrelevant because this fight is designed for an equitable split of all revenues including uk/us/international.

the total split wasn't 70/30 when all was said and done.
there's no way it could have been.

[$partacus]

Im on my ps3 right now...playing madden so this will be my last response for at least a hour.

Let's use Common Sense.
If Hatton made 40 Million when he was guaranteed only 6 Million than he
must of Made 34 Million off of UK p.p.v buys..

But their is one problem. The sky sports only made 37 million for the Hatton mayweather fight.

So you are telling me that Hatton took 34 of 37 million dollars from sky sports???


Because I am pretty sure Hatton didn't get any U.S p.p.v money if Floyd didn't get any UK p.p.v money...

The money came from UK and American PPVs, One pac fan posts some BS on a site and you believe it.

[Danny Gunz]

Hatton's the bigger name in US and a huge name in UK, and the fight is for his belt.

Thats like going into another teams stadium and saying "we will play you if you give us 60% of your sales"... dont make sense, split it down the middle both fighters deserve the money.

My best case scenario is winner gets 60 and loser gets 40 it sounds liek it makes sense but apparently in the boxing world its ludicrous

[Bogler]

Hatton's the bigger name in US and a huge name in UK, and the fight is for his belt.

Thats like going into another teams stadium and saying "we will play you if you give us 60% of your sales"... dont make sense, split it down the middle both fighters deserve the money.

My best case scenario is winner gets 60 and loser gets 40 it sounds liek it makes sense but apparently in the boxing world its ludicrous

pac getting the bigger share makes sense. hatton needs pac legacy wise not the other way around. hatton could go on and on fighting nobodies and become rich but would find it hard even catchin on pac's coattails on the atg list.