Hatton vs Pac-Man off. So who ducked who?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Xcel
    I've been better than you
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2006
    • 1965
    • 159
    • 85
    • 8,488

    #1

    Hatton vs Pac-Man off. So who ducked who?

    Contract disputes happen all the time but someone is always said to be ducking somebody. So who gets the blame this time?
    48
    Pacquiao
    52.08%
    25
    Hatton
    8.33%
    4
    Neither
    39.58%
    19
    Both
    0.00%
    0
  • -MAKAVELLI-
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 50080
    • 3,580
    • 2,792
    • 169,000

    #2
    noone did.............

    Comment

    • Joe2608
      The Red Devils
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 7753
      • 120
      • 108
      • 14,691

      #3
      No one ducked anyone, Pac-man is just being greedy.

      Comment

      • Reggie Miller
        Miller Time
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 6007
        • 746
        • 854
        • 13,289

        #4
        nobody did.

        Comment

        • Chase8400
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2007
          • 2861
          • 95
          • 63
          • 3,022

          #5
          Something went array and I will not pick neither being at fault so it had to be Manny doing the ducking.

          Comment

          • Chase8400
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2007
            • 2861
            • 95
            • 63
            • 3,022

            #6
            LOL @ the joke people picking Hatton.

            Comment

            • Addition
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 8534
              • 306
              • 140
              • 20,828

              #7
              Neither person ducked anyone.

              Comment

              • Boxing Bully
                Contender
                • Apr 2008
                • 130
                • 26
                • 0
                • 6,185

                #8
                All you have to do is read the reports and press releases, EVERYONE; Ray hatton, Bob Arum, Richard schaefer, even ROACH, ALL said that the fight was agreed at 50-50 by word agreement...

                ... then people close to Manny started whispering in his ears telling him to demand more money (most probably that fat guy we saw on Pacquiao/ De la hoya 24/7, who ate all that food for 2gs LOL)

                seriously ducking or not, that was a dumbass move by Manny. 50/50 of a HUGE PURSE, or now go elsewhere for 60/40 of a purse half the size

                Comment

                • Jone2ts
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 1059
                  • 53
                  • 25
                  • 1,239

                  #9
                  If this was Floyd everyone would say he's a coward and the same people that say Floyd looked like **** against De la Hoya have no problem with Pacman acting like De La Hoya was the P4P king when they fought. I have heard people saying Floyd was a ***** cause they thought De La Hoya was shot then...it's whatever but Pacman is not taking the fight so call it fair and call him a greedy coward like y'all would Floyd.

                  Comment

                  • Spacey1991
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 8885
                    • 247
                    • 282
                    • 18,684

                    #10
                    Nobody ducked nobody... they just couldn't agree on a purse split. Pacquiao wanted more after verbally agreeing to 50/50 and asked for 60/40 all of a sudden and Hatton wouldn't have any of it through principle. He offered 52/48 but then Pacquiao said he wanted more... Arum said he would take a shorter pay cut so Pacquiao can get more cash and he said no.

                    Pacquiao wanted a 60/40 split simply for more money, and Hatton rejected that through principle and had enough so pulled out because they were wasting there time. Seriously nobody ducked anybody in this case, well in my opinion anyway.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP