Contract disputes happen all the time but someone is always said to be ducking somebody. So who gets the blame this time?
Hatton vs Pac-Man off. So who ducked who?
Collapse
-
-
-
All you have to do is read the reports and press releases, EVERYONE; Ray hatton, Bob Arum, Richard schaefer, even ROACH, ALL said that the fight was agreed at 50-50 by word agreement...
... then people close to Manny started whispering in his ears telling him to demand more money (most probably that fat guy we saw on Pacquiao/ De la hoya 24/7, who ate all that food for 2gs LOL)
seriously ducking or not, that was a dumbass move by Manny. 50/50 of a HUGE PURSE, or now go elsewhere for 60/40 of a purse half the sizeComment
-
If this was Floyd everyone would say he's a coward and the same people that say Floyd looked like **** against De la Hoya have no problem with Pacman acting like De La Hoya was the P4P king when they fought. I have heard people saying Floyd was a ***** cause they thought De La Hoya was shot then...it's whatever but Pacman is not taking the fight so call it fair and call him a greedy coward like y'all would Floyd.Comment
-
Nobody ducked nobody... they just couldn't agree on a purse split. Pacquiao wanted more after verbally agreeing to 50/50 and asked for 60/40 all of a sudden and Hatton wouldn't have any of it through principle. He offered 52/48 but then Pacquiao said he wanted more... Arum said he would take a shorter pay cut so Pacquiao can get more cash and he said no.
Pacquiao wanted a 60/40 split simply for more money, and Hatton rejected that through principle and had enough so pulled out because they were wasting there time. Seriously nobody ducked anybody in this case, well in my opinion anyway.Comment
Comment